Thursday, October 14, 2010

Tender at the Bone, by Ruth Reichl


Reviewed by Christina

Published: 1998

It's about: Ruth Reichl, former New York Times restaurant critic and Gourmet magazine editor, describes her girlhood, adolescence, and young adulthood within the framework of the foods she ate and cooked throughout the years. Recipes are interspersed.

I thought: I admire Ms. Reichl, and I enjoyed reading about her life. She has traveled to some fantastic places (France, Italy, Tunisia) and eaten some enviable foods. For such a respected and successful person, she writes quite humbly about herself and her experiences. Her tone is always sincere (if a little rose-tinted) and never condescending. This book came highly recommended to me, and I wanted to love it.

But I just didn't. The writing was clear and precise, but not artful. Much of the book is spent describing delicious foods, but those passages always felt strained to me. To be fair, it is difficult to write about taste. Where most of us would just say, "Mmmm, that was sooooo good," Ms. Reichl has to come up with something more specific. I just tired of reading accolades like "the chicken was so tender it evaporated in my mouth." I found myself really wanting to read a description of something that tasted terrible, just for a little variety.

There were also a few sloppy glitches, like a fairly unusual adjective being used multiple times on the same page, or very similarly structured sentences within the same paragraph. I was surprised to see a couple of amusingly inappropriate uses of the word "literally." ("...literally put his money where his mouth was...") I suppose if Ms. Reichl's style had been more engaging I might have overlooked these little flaws. I also hate the sappy title, and am irked that it doesn't relate in any way to anything in the book.

The most interesting and relateable parts of this memoir are those that deal with young Ruth's relationships to people and places. Her bipolar mother is a larger-than-life character who I loved reading about. Her life in lower Manhattan and Berkeley in the 60's and 70's fascinated me. I like reading about food and cooking, and Ruth Reichl had a memoir-worthy life, but I won't be running to the library to pick up her other memoirs because I just didn't appreciate her writing style.

Verdict: In-between. It's interesting and enjoyable, but it's not going to change your life or anything.

Reading Recommendations: Try to turn off that analytical part of your brain, relax, and soak in Ruth Reichl's past. You can "click to look inside" this book on Amazon and read a few pages to test out whether or not this one is for you.

Warnings: none.

Favorite excerpts:
She held out a plate with large, smooth olives, unlike any I had seen. "Chinese olives," said Cecilia proudly.
I bit into one. "Lawrence Durrell," I said, wondering if I was pronouncing the name right, "said that olives had a taste as old as cold water." I rolled the musty pit around in my mouth, thinking that if I could come up with just one description as good I could call myself a writer.

Comments (10)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Seymour Butts's avatar

Seymour Butts · 754 weeks ago

I loved this review, mainly because I love to eat. Though my refusal to read this book stems less from the author's misuse of the word literally and more from my own general laziness, I do vow to eat some of the foods described in the book. So If madame Christina would be so kind as to post a few recipes in the comments section, this foodphile would be eternally grateful.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Thanks for the comment, Seymour Butts (teehee). As much as I'd love to share the recipes, I think posting them here would probably infringe upon a copyright or two. So in lieu of actual recipes, allow me to whet your appetite with a few titles:
Coconut Bread
Wiener Schnitzel
Claritha's Fried Chicken
Mohammad's Bisteeya
Boeuf à la Bourguignonne
You might be able to find the recipes themselves elsewhere online. Most of them looked too complicated or too meat-ridden for me. Good luck!
Christina, what a great review. I'm gad you went so into detail about what you didn't like about the writing. The misuse of the word "literally" is SO irritating to me! It also seems like it would be extremely difficult, though, to be writing about how food tastes without being melodramatic.
Thanks so much for your awesome review!
1 reply · active 754 weeks ago
Aw, shucks. Thanks for the thanks! And yeah, the whole "literally" thing really gets to me, too. Here are some good ones: http://literally.barelyfitz.com/
Great review, Christina! I recently read A Thousand Years Over a Hot Stove, which is the history of women in America as told through food, but I, too, was not very impressed with it and was drawn to the more human aspects of it.

Sounds like I won't be reading this one!
1 reply · active 754 weeks ago
Hm, I thought A Thousand Years Over a Hot Stove sounded interesting, but I won't be bumping it to the top of my list if you didn't think it was that great.
It's 5 years since I read this book and I must say I found it and the next one rather engaging - but no, not life changing and I really don't remember a lot of detail. I thought the title worked in its double meaning in terms of food AND on her own youthful naivety.

As IngridLola14 knows, I have just reviewed her latest book, not a cooking memoir but a sort of reassessment of her mother and her feelings for her. It's nicely written: http://whisperinggums.wordpress.com/2010/10/15/ru...
3 replies · active 754 weeks ago
Haha, yes, thank you for leaving your link!
Thanks for the link. I really like your thoughts about Reichl's and Jennings' mothers, and mothers who grew up in that era in general. Along the topic of Moms in memoirs, you might be interested in Connie's review a few days ago of Azar Nafisi's Things I've Been Silent About. (http://thebluebookcase.blogspot.com/2010/10/review-things-ive-been-silent-about-by.html)
About the title of this book: I got that it was a reference to naivety, but I didn't think Ruth Reichl painted herself as particularly naive. It seemed like the idea was just to tie food and youth together somehow, and I guess I wanted something a little more specific to her experience. Not that I have any better ideas to offer. :)
Fair enough. It's a while since I read it. She was 16 when she left home though wasn't she? But if she didn't convey naivety in the memoir then the title is difficult to justify.

I'll check out the Nafisi review. I did read her previous book, and had heard she had a new one out.

Post a new comment

Comments by