Reviewed by Connie
Published: 1998
It's about: Four men, united by one woman with whom they have all had an affair, reunite at her funeral. From that point, their futures are fatefully intertwined, each one making decisions that send the others dangerously close to the edge. It's a novel about the choices we make and the price we are willing (or unwilling) to pay for morality's sake. Though this is my first McEwan book, I am familiar with and have seen the movie of Atonement, so I'm going to venture a guess that this is a bit of a recurring theme of his.
The story centers around two of Molly's former lovers who have remained close friends throughout the years -- Clive, a celebrated composer working on his highly anticipated millennial symphony, and Vernon, the Editor-in-Chief of a newspaper headed, like many others, to the pits.
I thought: Since McEwan's focus is on morality and the ripples sent out by the decisions we make, it doesn't necessarily come across as the most believable tale -- especially the ending, which seems a little far-fetched and contrived -- the sort of cautionary tale that Mark Twain would take the mickey out of in his later years. However, it accomplishes its purpose in that it made me question what decision I would make between doing the apparent "right thing" and preserving the integrity of my life's work.
The story itself is enjoyable and intriguing, and though a few parts (descriptions of scenery, etc) dragged, it was never more than a couple of pages before the story picked up again. Although I did not particularly see myself becoming bosom buddies with any of the characters, I was still interested to see what happened to them -- a difficult balance successfully achieved, I thought.
Perhaps the best thing I can say about this novel is that it's all about the psychological realism -- what it means to be a human, how a human thinks, what goes on inside our heads -- my favorite kind of novel. So kuddos, Ian, for that.
Verdict: It isn't the BEST novel of its kind I've ever read, but it's still worth sticking on the shelf -- or borrowing it from the library's, as I did.
Reading Recommendations: It's a pretty quick read -- only 200 pages with spaced out lines, so this would be great to take with you on vacation
Warnings: A few f-bombs (3 or 4) and a brief, mild scene of a (feeble and quickly abandoned) attempt at masturbation
Favorite excerpts:
"So many faces Clive had never seen by daylight, and looking terrible, like cadavers jerked upright to welcome the newly dead."
"This exercise of authority did not sharpen his sense of self, as it usually did. Instead it seemed to Vernon that he was infinitely diluted; he was simply the sum of all the people who had listened to him, and when he was alone, he was nothing at all."
Currently reading: My Name is Asher Lev by Chaim Potok
Thursday, November 4, 2010
Comments (11)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Post a new comment
Comments by IntenseDebate
Reply as a Guest, or login:
Go back
Connected as (Logout)
Not displayed publicly.
Connected as (Logout)
Not displayed publicly.
Posting anonymously.
Review: Amsterdam by Ian McEwan
2010-11-04T08:00:00-04:00
MedSchoolWife
Book Reviews|Connie|Contemporary Fiction|Fiction|On the Shelf|
stinavw 80p · 751 weeks ago
Does it take place in Amsterdam, then? I love that place.
ConnieGirl 69p · 751 weeks ago
I think I'm going to check out Atonement soon, too! I've heard from other people who have read more McEwan that this is generally their least favorite of his books, but then again, it DID win the Booker Prize... weird.
RoseCityReader 60p · 751 weeks ago
I fall in the camp of loving Amsterdam wholeheartedly. I thought it was diabolically clever, like the best of Roald Dahl. And I don't mean that the ending was a clever twist -- the end is just the necessary, faux morality play wrap-up to the wicked funny satire of the whole thing. The two main characters were such pompous twits and McEwan makes such mockery of them. It is my favorite McEwan book of all.
ConnieGirl 69p · 751 weeks ago
If you have written a review on it, or if you know of a review that expresses that perspective, I'd be interested in reading it -- if you want to post the link here.
I definitely picked up on the megalomaniac tendencies of the main characters, but I didn't read it as farcical. Ironic, especially with the ending, yes, but not farcical.
RoseCityReader 60p · 751 weeks ago
I didn't review Amsterdam because I read it years ago, before I started reviewing. But a little time on the googlator seems to show that Amsterdam is commonly considered satire:
McEwan himself described Amsterdam as satire, which you can find on the Guardian's author page for McEwan: http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/jun/12/ian.m...
While I cannot find the article itself, when Amsterdam won the Booker Prize in 1998, the Guardian's headline was "Third Time Lucky As McEwan Satire Wins Booker Prize." I found the headline on McEwan's website: http://www.ianmcewan.com/bib/books/amsterdam.html
The BBC also referred to Amsterdam as satire -- http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/audiointerviews/prof... -- in its introduction to an interview with McEwan.
And a search for "McEwan satire Amsterdam" turned up a long list of various books reviews.
ConnieGirl 69p · 751 weeks ago
I still don't really think that I would consider it a satire, though. My idea of a satire is more along the lines of Candide, the kind of book that at some point abandons all pretense of reality and just becomes ridiculous. Amsterdam, I thought, still tries to stay grounded in reality throughout. It seemed more like it was trying to build up to a twist at the end, but I just didn't find the twist very... satisfying.
IngridLola14 79p · 751 weeks ago
ConnieGirl 69p · 751 weeks ago
I feel like I need to read several more McEwans before I can really form an opinion about him.....
Sandra · 751 weeks ago
LuciaBee 40p · 751 weeks ago
Debbie Rodgers · 718 weeks ago