Thursday, February 24, 2011

Review: A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L'Engle

Reviewed by Connie

Published: 1964

It's about: A science-fiction/fantasy, children's novel about Meg Murry and her younger brother, Charles Wallace Murry, who cross infinite space and time with three "witches" -- Mrs. Whatsit, Mrs. Who, and Mrs. Which -- in order to rescue their scientist father, who is trapped on a "dark planet" in another galaxy. In the process, they come to battle Evil itself.

I thought: I hadn't read this book since childhood, but I decided recently to revisit it, primarily to figure out if it is as weird as I was remembering... and it was.

Let's start with the good points. I respect the allegory of the story and its presentation of battling an Evil that threatens to destroy from within. I also enjoyed reading about some highly unusual characters -- Meg, Calvin, and Charles Wallace. Meg, as the protagonist, is described as awkward, -- we're talking big glasses and braces here -- of mostly average intelligence, easily angry, and sickeningly dependent. I was annoyed with Meg for most of the novel, for always looking to the male characters to sort everything out, so I was pleasantly surprised with and heartily approved of the ending, with her own personal journey that leads her to find courage and confidence within herself.

Other than that, though, I can't exactly sing this book's praises. The allegory, though respectable, was a bit too -- obvious -- for my taste. Granted, this is a children's book, but it comes across to me as if L'Engle sat down and said, "All right, I'm going to write an allegory of good overcoming evil" and THEN came up with every element of the story to fit that. Not my favorite style there.

Plus, it may be that I am brainwashed by the YA literature and movies of today, but I found the story too skeletal -- especially the climax. Things are resolved too quickly with not enough struggle, not enough adventure, not enough meat. Just a personal preference.

Verdict: In-between

Reading Recommendations: I wouldn't call this a "must read," though I know LOTS of people who would say otherwise.

Warnings: quite a bit of whining and a dash of sentimentality, not to mention a crystal ball

Interesting Information: Disney made a movie version of the book back in 2003. I haven't seen it, but I love Madeleine L'Engle's comment on it. When someone asked her if the book fulfilled her expectations, she replied, "Yes, I expected it to be bad, and it is." Gotta respect her bluntness.


What I'm reading next: Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro

Comments (15)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I know what you mean about the bad points, but I think it helps to remember that this was a completely new kind of book for the YA market at the time, and it took years to get it published. Everyone thought it was way too weird and fantastic, and the standard was for much shorter books.

Did you see this first entry for the 90-second Newbery video contest? I LOVE it...
You know, I had the same experience just recently. Loved it when I was younger, but upon re-reading, it just didn't hold up for me. The ending came too quickly and it all just seemed very weird. Love Never Let Me Go...can't wait to hear what you have to say.
I also haven't read any of the Kairos books since I was a kid and I remember really liking them then, but as I've re-read some of my early favorites I agree that sometimes the plot lines and characters developments seem a little too simplistic. I'll have to give this one another try. I really do like her Chronos books though, even today.
I remember this being read to our class as a youngster and liking it. I don't remember the bad points, but maybe that's just as well. I remember thinking it was kind of weird though! Great post!
This is one of those books that changed my life when I was a young reader and I identified very strongly with Meg at the time. Although I frequently go back and re-read L'Engle's A Ring of Endless Light, I've not had the heart to reread this one because I don't want to topple a childhood monument! Still, it was pretty revolutionary for its time, and it was certainly eye opening for me when I read it in 1979 in small Midwest milltown!
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
I can certainly see how you would identify with Meg (especially by the end). My advice would be to not reread this one if it meant that much to you! Some memories are better left untouched, don't you think?
I couldn't agree more. It's wonderful how rich and satisfying children's literature is today.
This is one of my favorite books from my childhood. The tv version didn't even come close to the twisted awkward darkness I remember in the book.
1 reply · active 735 weeks ago
"twisted awkward darkness" -- well said! I like that description
I loved A Wrinkle in Time!!!! Great book!!!!
I've been re-reading and reviewing L'Engle's work lately, and I have also been disappointed for the most part. The two exceptions have been A Swiftly Tilting Planet (one of the sequels to A Wrinkle in Time) and A Ring of Endless Light. I really loved those two. But most of L'Engle's work is under-developed and cheesy, in my opinion... I'm planning to write up a post with another book blogger debating her merits this week, in fact.

In the meantime, check out my thoughts on her various novels: http://wonderlauren-reads.blogspot.com/search/lab...
1 reply · active 735 weeks ago
This is actually the only L'Engle book that I have read, but it's good to know that most of it is of comparable quality. I'll be sure to check your site out!
I read this book a couple of years ago, and, like you, I thought it was weird, unlike anything I'd ever read. The Madeleine L'engle quote made me laugh though. :)
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
I thought it was awfully clever of her, too! Couldn't help but include it :)
I loved this as a child and I have to admit that I am still a fan. I don't re-read it very often but I enjoy it when I do. It is incredibly unusual and this overcame any other issues I had with it. The characters were wonderful, if somewhat annoying. It is definitely a bit cheesy though :-)

Post a new comment

Comments by