Thursday, April 7, 2011

Guest Review: The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark Haddon


Guest review by Rachel. Rachel is Christina’s cousin and an English MA student. She is currently procrastinating the writing of a thesis on the post-modern journey myth in House of Leaves and the video game Portal. Despite her elitist tendencies, she enjoys anime and popular video games.


Published: 2003


It’s about: A high-functioning autistic boy narrates his quest to solve the murder of a neighborhood dog. In the process he becomes more independent and opens at least one can of proverbial worms.


I thought: I had a hard time suspending my belief for the autistic child narrator. I know it allows authors to have an excuse to describe the world in a new and interesting way, but in this case, it’s unbelievable. Autistic children are notorious for their difficulty in verbalizing even simple needs, let alone complex scenes involving an awareness of what aspects of their disorder are unique and readers might find interesting (I assume it’s not Asperger’s because of the boy’s other extreme symptoms). Despite my personal difficulties, I really enjoyed the investigation half of this book. It made me think of how ordinary things could be puzzling to children (even children with autism). It also made me think about math(s), even though I still don’t understand The Monty Hall Problem.*

The last half (dealing with the solution to the mystery) wasn’t as fun to read. It just made me kind of annoyed. Haddon’s autistic narration style gets old after a while. The whole thing felt a little like Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close lite-edition, complete with a child investigating something and having lots of anxiety about it.


Verdict: In between. Buy it used or borrow it from a library or friend.


Reading Recommendations: This book could probably devastate a child who is grieving over the death of a loved one.


Warnings: Some vulgar language. Also, Christopher uses the word “sex.” His father sometimes drinks alcohol.



*You choose from three doors, 2 of which are goats and one of which is a car. They show you one of the goats from one of the other two doors, and it’s statistically in your best interest to change doors, even though intuitively it seems like that won’t really change anything.

Comments (16)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
This makes me really sad! I really loved Curious Incident and even loved that little logic problem he gave. You seem to have a greater knowledge of autism than I do, so I don't want to argue the topic of the narration to much, but isn't autism a spectrum in which it's really difficult to lump people together? I don't know, but I really enjoyed the voice and the investigation and the afterwards and everything. And now I want to reread it!

Completely off-topic, but I feel like those kinds of warnings are just silly. George shoots Lenny in the head, but is that kind of warning really a valid reason not to read Of Mice and Men? I'm not trying to be argumentative, but I feel like avoiding books for little reasons like that is what leads to people banning books.
3 replies · active 729 weeks ago
Yeah, I guess I was thinking that kids might enjoy this book, but the content makes more sense for and is more appropriate for adults. I too enjoyed the book, but I guess little things often bother me.
Jennifer, I'm surprised that you are actually the first one to say something about our "Warnings." The reason we put that in there is that the university that Connie, Rachel, and I attend is very conservative, and many people there appreciate at least knowing what to expect. However, now that our blog has expanded quite a bit, the majority of our readers do not attend our university and are much more varied in their reading experiences and preferences.
The warnings aren't intended to discourage people from reading the books; as Ingrid says, the idea is just to let people know about content, just as mpaa issues content disclosures for movies, and viewers make personal decisions about whether they want to view it. Same idea here, let people know what's in it, and people can decid for themselves whether they want to read it.
This makes me really sad! I really loved Curious Incident and even loved that little logic problem he gave. You seem to have a greater knowledge of autism than I do
Thanks for the review, Rachel! I read this when it first came out, and I really liked it. Christopher's perspective was new to me, and it was a good fast-paced summertime read. But I wasn't really reading with a critical eye; it's likely that I wouldn't be as enthralled if I were to read it today.
1 reply · active 729 weeks ago
Yeah, I enjoyed it too, but I suppose if I read it critically I might see more of its flaws. I remember the ending being disappointing, too.
I think the Monty Hall Problem works as follows: on your initial choice, you have a one in three chance of picking the car. Therefore there is a two in three chance that the car is behind one of the other doors. This doesn't change. Monty then shows a goat behind one of the other two doors. If you stay with your initial choice, you keep your one in three chance. If you switch, however, you effectively get both of the other doors (as Monty has removed one from the equation) and so your chance is 2 in three, meaning it is better to switch. And yes, it is thoroughly counter-intuitive!
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
That sounds about right. The diagram in the book was fairly helpful.
I really enjoyed this one! Too bad it didn't work for you.
I felt haddon did catch some parts of autism well and I think it is actually auspergers he has ,having work with people with both some of his observations and connections with the world rung true also the obsessions ,I loved this book when I read it ,all the best stu
I had a hard time with the narration at times, too, but I did enjoy looking at the world through a different set of eyes. The book dragged for me at times; from the description, I was expecting something different.
I read this after reading A Spot of Bother. I thought Spot was rather ordinary and depressing, but wanted to see why this book got such raves. I really enjoyed it--it was quite different from what I usually read.
Very ho-hum for me too - seems like Haddon was describing what an autistic was doing, and pawning it off like he knew what an austicitc was saying.
http://eclectic-indulgence.blogspot.com/2008/08/c...
Thanks for the guest review! I was glad to read that you didn't love this book. I read it quite a while ago and can hardly remember any of it, but I remember finding it pretty disappointing, especially after all the hype.
I read this book, too. I found the boy's thought process to be very interesting. I believe that the author was accurate on how a person with autism thinks.

Contrary to your reaction to the book, I found the ending to be the better part of the book.

Post a new comment

Comments by