Guest review by Rachel. Rachel is Christina’s cousin and an English MA student. She is currently procrastinating the writing of a thesis on the post-modern journey myth in House of Leaves and the video game Portal. Despite her elitist tendencies, she enjoys anime and popular video games.
Published: 2003
It’s about: A high-functioning autistic boy narrates his quest to solve the murder of a neighborhood dog. In the process he becomes more independent and opens at least one can of proverbial worms.
I thought: I had a hard time suspending my belief for the autistic child narrator. I know it allows authors to have an excuse to describe the world in a new and interesting way, but in this case, it’s unbelievable. Autistic children are notorious for their difficulty in verbalizing even simple needs, let alone complex scenes involving an awareness of what aspects of their disorder are unique and readers might find interesting (I assume it’s not Asperger’s because of the boy’s other extreme symptoms). Despite my personal difficulties, I really enjoyed the investigation half of this book. It made me think of how ordinary things could be puzzling to children (even children with autism). It also made me think about math(s), even though I still don’t understand The Monty Hall Problem.*
The last half (dealing with the solution to the mystery) wasn’t as fun to read. It just made me kind of annoyed. Haddon’s autistic narration style gets old after a while. The whole thing felt a little like Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close lite-edition, complete with a child investigating something and having lots of anxiety about it.
Verdict: In between. Buy it used or borrow it from a library or friend.
Reading Recommendations: This book could probably devastate a child who is grieving over the death of a loved one.
Warnings: Some vulgar language. Also, Christopher uses the word “sex.” His father sometimes drinks alcohol.
*You choose from three doors, 2 of which are goats and one of which is a car. They show you one of the goats from one of the other two doors, and it’s statistically in your best interest to change doors, even though intuitively it seems like that won’t really change anything.
Published: 2003
It’s about: A high-functioning autistic boy narrates his quest to solve the murder of a neighborhood dog. In the process he becomes more independent and opens at least one can of proverbial worms.
I thought: I had a hard time suspending my belief for the autistic child narrator. I know it allows authors to have an excuse to describe the world in a new and interesting way, but in this case, it’s unbelievable. Autistic children are notorious for their difficulty in verbalizing even simple needs, let alone complex scenes involving an awareness of what aspects of their disorder are unique and readers might find interesting (I assume it’s not Asperger’s because of the boy’s other extreme symptoms). Despite my personal difficulties, I really enjoyed the investigation half of this book. It made me think of how ordinary things could be puzzling to children (even children with autism). It also made me think about math(s), even though I still don’t understand The Monty Hall Problem.*
The last half (dealing with the solution to the mystery) wasn’t as fun to read. It just made me kind of annoyed. Haddon’s autistic narration style gets old after a while. The whole thing felt a little like Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close lite-edition, complete with a child investigating something and having lots of anxiety about it.
Verdict: In between. Buy it used or borrow it from a library or friend.
Reading Recommendations: This book could probably devastate a child who is grieving over the death of a loved one.
Warnings: Some vulgar language. Also, Christopher uses the word “sex.” His father sometimes drinks alcohol.
*You choose from three doors, 2 of which are goats and one of which is a car. They show you one of the goats from one of the other two doors, and it’s statistically in your best interest to change doors, even though intuitively it seems like that won’t really change anything.
Jennifer · 729 weeks ago
Completely off-topic, but I feel like those kinds of warnings are just silly. George shoots Lenny in the head, but is that kind of warning really a valid reason not to read Of Mice and Men? I'm not trying to be argumentative, but I feel like avoiding books for little reasons like that is what leads to people banning books.
Rachel · 729 weeks ago
IngridLola14 79p · 729 weeks ago
Connie · 729 weeks ago
Jennifer · 729 weeks ago
stinavw 80p · 729 weeks ago
Andrea Landaker 4p · 729 weeks ago
Falaise · 729 weeks ago
Rachel · 729 weeks ago
Trisha · 729 weeks ago
winstonsdad 43p · 729 weeks ago
Lisa · 729 weeks ago
Susan · 729 weeks ago
Eclectic Indulgence · 729 weeks ago
http://eclectic-indulgence.blogspot.com/2008/08/c...
ConnieGirl 69p · 729 weeks ago
Shan · 729 weeks ago
Contrary to your reaction to the book, I found the ending to be the better part of the book.