Sunday, February 5, 2012

Post: Why I Review


Post by Ingrid

We've never participated in The Sunday Salon before, but since I had a topic in mind I thought today would be a good day to start.

The Sunday Salon.comWhat makes a good review? It seems like everyone has a different answer to this question. Last summer Jeff at The Reading Ape wrote a post on the reader centered review, which sparked a great conversation in the comments. I reread this post today as I've recently been thinking quite a bit about how I frame my own reviews.

The Blue Bookcase is coming up on its 2 year anniversary in March. Over these past 2 years we've cycled through different reviewers and started to participate in and host new memes. The main content of this blog, though, has always been book reviews. In her one year anniversary post last March, Connie wrote that her original purpose for the blog was to keep track of the books she had read and to exchange reviews with her friends. We've tried to keep the tone of this blog casual and accessible, and though we have expanded quite a bit since those first few months, we hope that The Blue Bookcase will always remain this way.

I was still in school and inculcated in academia when I first started to review here, and I remember how I tried to write my reviews from a more scholarly point of view. (The Comparative Literature department I studied in was known for its elitism, and though I tried not to let it affect me, I realize now that it kind of did.) However, now that I'm more familiar and comfortable with the book blogging community and the other girls that write for this blog, I realize that in those early reviews I came off a little bit arrogant. I truly hope that I've been able to move away from that tone as my reviewing style has evolved. On the other hand, as I've read back over some of my more recent reviews, I wish I had been able to discuss the books I've reviewed in more depth instead of just quickly listing off what I liked or didn't like about it. Part of me misses that academic frame of reference that school provided for me, and I wish I could somehow still bring that into my reviews.

So, as we move toward our second anniversary, I hope to be able to strike a balance between maintaining the fun, casual tone of this blog as well as digging a little deeper in the way I write about books. I also hope to apply to graduate school this year, and I want to use this blog as a platform to improve the way I write and think about literature. I love the fun, laid-back book discussion this blog has provided, and I believe the atmosphere this blog has created is truly why I review.

Of course, we also have the lovely and intelligent Connie, Christina, Lucia, Liesl, and Christine-Chioma who also regularly write reviews for The Blue Bookcase. Part of the fun of this blog is the fact that we all approach our reviews in different ways. Hopefully these girls will share in the comments their point of view on this topic.

What about you? If you are a book blogger, why do you review? What do you look for in reviews you read from other book blogs?

Comments (25)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I love reading these Sunday Salon posts, they're always so thoughtful! As for me, I can see where you're coming from when you say you tried to write your reviews from a "scholarly" point of view. I have a degree in Spanish and part of the reason I started my own blog was that after two years out of undergrad and into a PhD on something completely literature-unrelated, I was missing the more in-depth analyses of books I did while studying. I've realised since then that book blogging is considerably different from writing literature papers though - but I love it nevertheless ;) !
1 reply · active 686 weeks ago
Yes, exactly. I miss academic things, and I used to think book blogging was like that. But I've come to appreciate it for what it is. Thanks for your comment!
I like this post! And I really enjoyed reading the discussion you linked to over at Reading Ape. I agree that it's difficult to keep reviews fun and appropriately casual while also taking a stab at more scholarly points. I wish I were better at that balance.
And now I'm going to check out some of your earlier posts. I don't remember ever thinking you were arrogant, so I'm curious.
3 replies · active 686 weeks ago
The tone they are written in is very different than my writing now. I also don't think I tried to be funny back then ... which I do now, haha.
I don't think you were arrogant, but I've definitely noticed a change in tone -- I think we've all altered our writing and review styles since we've been on tBB
I didn't find any arrogance, either, but yeah, the tone has changed. I know that's happened with me, too. I've pretty much given in to the personal and informal tone that comes most naturally to me. I'm not really trying to prove how smart I am anymore. :)
very thoughtful post, I could definitely relate to it!
1 reply · active 686 weeks ago
I love talking books, always have so a review, is just me talking books. :) I write like i talk so with my reviews you get the gushy SQQUUEEESSS if called for, and the "doh's!" when I should have figured some plot line out and did not....

I want to know how a book makes a person feel and that is what I put into my reviews... I want people to know what they are about to experience and if my review gets someone to read and love a book that I have loved as well... that is the ultimate reward.
3 replies · active 686 weeks ago
I love reading blogs like yours that are written in a conversational tone. This is one of the things I've learned to love about book blogging. :)
Ahhh thanks - me too! I love feeling like i know the reviewer.
Thank you for this thoughtful post. I am new to review world, but I struggle with the same feelings. I have found that my more "scholarly" reviews sound arrogant, but they are born of lack of confidence. I'm learning to accept that people don't have to agree with me, or even agree that I know what I'm talking about. The point is to put myself out there.
1 reply · active 686 weeks ago
Absolutely. I hope to be able to be less sensitive to criticism and just be confident about what I write. It's hard sometimes though.
Distance is critical. In reading, in intellectual matters and even if physical work, like boxing for example. Establishing proper distance is vital to not get punched in the face. I review to gain perspective on my readings and keep my mind busy. Also, as I am a hack writer myself, it helps in the learning part of the process.
3 replies · active 686 weeks ago
That's a great point, Ben. I think distance is important. In my reviews I hope to be able to look beyond my first emotional reaction to a book, for example.
I think it depends. Sometimes a deeply emotional response to a book can be enlightening for other people, but you need to use your judgment with each book.
Yes, I think a deeply emotional response can be enlightening, but I think once you have some distance from the book you can recognize if it was truly a meaningful emotional reaction or just a shallow one. Sometimes its hard to know in the moment.
Hi: Great question - I started my book blog to focus my reading on my own library and to help myself move through the authors and classics that I wanted to read. I don't know if I think of my posts as reviews per se - maybe more like discussions? I write them for myself - trying to identify key themes that interested me and I write them for my readers - trying to give them enough of a sense of the book so that they can better choose whether to read it, trying to entertain and provoke. That's probably the definition of a review, I know - but I'm still a bit uncomfortable with the word as a label for what I write and I avoid using the word on my blog. Thanks, Ruby
3 replies · active 686 weeks ago
I've noticed that a lot of book bloggers are hesitant to use the word "review." I think discussion is a good way to put it. That's one of the things I love about book blogging - that people are eager to comment and join in the discussion. Published reviews, like in a newspaper for example, don't have this.
Maybe I am just an odd one out, but for the most part, most of my posts about books are reviews more than discussions. Most of the time, the people who read the reviews have not read the books, so it's hard to discuss a book with someone who hasn't read it. Of course that's not always the case, and when other people have read the book, I do enjoy discussing in the comments. The other exception is events like we just hosted with the Moby Dick readalong.

I think I review for a number of reasons -- I still do it to keep track of the books I read and to share thoughts/recommendations with friends (ones I already have and ones I make from other blogs, etc), but I also do it to force myself to analyze a book, to think about it more deeply and thus get more from it. I loved being an English major because I loved discussing books, and I loved analyzing and writing about them. It forced me to get more out of each book I read and enhanced my appreciation for writing and literature. That's why I continue to do that on the blog, too. Though the format and tone are different, I think the purpose is pretty similar.
Interesting. So do you think one of the main things that seperates a review from a discussion is whether or not the people who read it have read the book? I guess now that I think about it, I almost always assume that my audience hasn't read a book I'm writing about, unless it's a classic like Moby Dick. Most of the book blogs I read though seem to be much more discussion oriented.
I started my book blog for a similar reason. I wanted to keep track of the books I was reading and be able to discuss them with others. I don't think that has changed too much over the last couple years. I do love that I've been able to make blogging friends and read new books they recommend. I also love the discussions that come with book blogging. Things like read-alongs (like the recent Moby Dick one you hosted!) have done so much to enhance my appreciation for books I might have otherwise avoided.
I approach it as a combination between things I'd say at a book club or how I'd describe the book to like... Connie or another friend that likes to read. If it's a book I like I try to make other people read it/like it. It's very different from my analytical essays from my BYU days. But I do think we all have a different approach to it.
Sorry for my late comment, but I review because I want people to see my enjoyment for a book or why I didn't like a particular book. I may not express myself well with words, but I want to people to see why I either liked a particular book or why I didn't like it.

Post a new comment

Comments by