Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Review: Wit by Margaret Edson

Cynthia Nixon in the current broadway run of Wit (via)
Reviewed by Christina

Published: 1993

It's about: Wit (or W;t) is a pulitzer-winning play that centers around Vivian Bearing, a professor of seventeenth-century poetry who is being aggressively treated for stage-four ovarian cancer.

I thought: Reading a play is like smelling a cake.

Wit is well-written, nicely paced, and extremely smart, with a sprinkling of wry humor. There's a cool metafictional/postmodern element with Vivian speaking many of her lines directly to the audience, calling for "action," referring to her own last lines and closing scene. The characters' voices ring true. But when I finished reading it, I wasn't satisfied. The basic story- crotchety professor on her deathbed learns the importance of human kindness- seemed shallow, moralistic, and obvious. The whole thing reminded me a bit of A Christmas Carol. I just didn't love it, and I didn't get why it is so highly regarded.

But then, in lieu of seeing it on stage, I watched the film adaptation. And I pretty much came unglued. Wit moved me when everything came together: the relationships between the characters made sense, Vivian became real and her story became profound. All the themes that I had overlooked or brushed aside in my reading suddenly struck me as undeniable truths.

Verdict: Well... Hm. I wouldn't really call this a must-read in itself. But if you have the opportunity to see it, DO. I guess it's an in-between.

Reading Recommendations: It's only 80 pages long, and it's definitely worth reading in a single sitting. And if you're going to bother reading it, you REALLY need to see the play or the movie afterward to get the full effect.

Warnings: one or two swears

Favorite excerpts:
"Grand Rounds is not Grand Opera. But compared to lying here, it is positively dramatic.
Full of subservience, hierarchy, gratuitous displays, sublimated rivalries- I feel right at home. It is just like a graduate seminar.
With one important difference: in Grand Rounds, they read me like a book. Once I did the teaching, now I am taught.
This is much easier. I just hold still and look cancerous. It requires less acting every time."

What I'm reading next: The Book of Mormon Girl by Joanna Brooks

Comments (13)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I've never read the play, but I saw the movie with Emma Thompson and OH MY GOSH. They made us watch it in nursing school, which was cruel & unusual because I spent the last half of it in physical pain from trying not to burst into sobs and keep my crying dignified. I'm a cancer nurse now and I'm glad I saw it, but I don't know if I could handle it again.
4 replies · active 683 weeks ago
Yes! I am not usually a big crier, but I was really not able to hold it in with this movie. Emma Thompson is incredible, and I understand about not wanting to experience that again.
That is very cool that you're a cancer nurse! That's one profession I really admire.
Ooooh I'm sold. Totally going to watch the movie. I loooooove Emma Thompson.
Let us know what you think! I love her too.
I find I usually have that experience with great plays. They're not intended to be read -- they're intended to be seen. That's also why a lot of people don't like Shakespeare, I think -- they haven't SEEN it
1 reply · active 683 weeks ago
True. I didn't think about Shakespeare, but that makes perfect sense.
I've only seen the film version (I think they make everyone in the medical field see it) and I loved it. I wouldn't attempt to read the play. I hate reading plays
1 reply · active 683 weeks ago
Yeah, I gotta say... I don't think I'll be going out of my way to read more plays.
I completely came unglued with the Emma Thompson adaptation. I read the play after. It's def one of my favorites.
2 replies · active 683 weeks ago
Interesting, so you sort of had the opposite experience I did. Were you moved by the text as much as by the movie?
Because I'd already seen it fleshed out in film, the gaps weren't noticeable: I was replaying it all in my head as I read the play. So, no, there was no difference for me.

There was a play I read in which I vastly preferred the movie, and that was Neil LaBute's Closer.

One play that is pretty amazing (if you want to try something different) is Tennessee Williams's The Glass Menagerie. I read it a few times and could see it all clearly in my head.
I thought this one was really powerful. I read it a few years ago, but then I had the chance to see it performed live and it was amazing!
1 reply · active 683 weeks ago
Did you think it was powerful when you read it, before you had seen it? Or was the power more in the performance?

Post a new comment

Comments by