Monday, September 27, 2010

Guest Review: Lavinia by Ursula K. Le Guin

For those of you who missed the post, we here at the Blue Bookcase are looking to expand our horizons and add a new writer! (Or more than one, perhaps) This continues our session of "test-runs" for writers who look promising, so let's give a warm welcome to guest reviewer/aspiring BB writer, Zee! Be sure to comment and tell us what you think! (And for other interested writers, it's not too late to apply! Check out this post for more details)

Hi, I'm Zee and I'm fairly new to the book blogging world. I live in the UK and besides reading I also enjoy painting, drawing and writing stories. My blog 'Zee's Wordly Obsessions' has been online for nearly four months now and I thoroughly enjoy sharing my thoughts with other like-minded bookish people. As a self-confessed bibliophile and English graduate my tastes tend to lean more towards the classics, Contemporary and Literary fiction. Like all serious readers I'm always worrying about time, so I like to choose books that I know I will to some extent enjoy, and more importantly learn from. However that doesn't mean I limit myself to a few genres. I also enjoy reading detective fiction, Cyber fiction and lately even some Sci-Fi. I'm hoping to explore a wider variety of genres as I continue to blog, and as an aspiring writer myself my reviews tend to focus on trying to understand the craft of the writer.

Published: 2010
It's about: Trapped between the verses of 'The Aeneid' is the ghostly figure of Lavinia, daughter and princess of Latium. Conjured briefly into being by the Etruscan poet Vergil, she exists as a forgettable figure in that Trojan epic of war and conquest. From a half-light that is neither life nor death; she calls out, pale and thin. She speaks of her long, narrow existence and the injustice that was done to her. To be sure, she is dead; but neither has her soul returned to the underworld where it belongs. Like all poetic figures, words grant her immortal life, yet her fictional self mourns the mere sketch she has been reduced to. Lavinia's song is incomplete; her life much more than a fleeting verse. Even the poet bewails his shortcoming, calling her his unfulfilled, his unfinished.
Thus Lavinia emerges from under the weight of meter and verse to narrate her own story. Her life as an expendable pawn in her father's court is not as simple as Vergil made it seem. With her mother mad from grief and her father an aging king; Lavinia has no choice but to regard marriage as peace alliance between the various kingdoms of Latium. Yet one night at the sacred springs, she is visited by an apparition which is none other than her poet. As his body lies dying on a boat, his spirit breaks free and finds Lavinia, praying about the uncertainty of her future. As she meets the author of her being who begins to tell her her fate, he also realises that Lavinia is more than he gives her credit to be. He describes the foreigner that she will wed, the bloodshed that ensues, and the glory that will eventually be the city of 'Ruma', which will be born from her union with the celebrated warrior Aeneas.
Having learned her fate, Lavinia decides to obey the oracle no matter what. She goes against her mother who favours the handsome and arrogant Turnus, setting herself and her people on a perilous path. 
I thought: The beauty of this story lies in the perspective it's written from. Taking the figurative saying 'immortalised in poetry' and applying it to the historical figure of Lavinia is inspired to say the least. Even though I'm not a big fan of Women's fiction (preferring the classics and more literary books) I found that 'Lavinia' posed some very important questions about the role of poetry. And it did so successfully without using any difficult academic theory. Le Guin chose to 'act out' these ideas through the character of Lavinia, giving her character the opportunity to talk about how it feels to be powerless over the image she has been given. By the third chapter I was rethinking the whole image of epic poetry and just how much these legendary characters are faithful to their real selves.
I also found the prose to be very smooth and uncomplicated, which is refreshing when you think about the subject matter. With a topic like Greek poetry, there is a great tendency to emulate the arcane language of the ancients. But thankfully Le Guin completely ignores this, and chooses to stay faithful to a contemporary style that does not alienate the reader. Le Guin's novel is also different in that it also adds many new dimensions to a character that is little-known. Why she chose Lavinia is something that she comments upon generously at the back of the book. I would like to think that like all great authors she is an excellent 'method writer'. Le Guin felt out each of her characters, trying to portray them in a 'human' light rather than depict them as mythological figures or demi-gods. 
The novel ends on an ambiguous note, as we do not know exactly where Lavinia is telling her story from. In fact, I had a feeling that Le Guin saw herself as a kind of soothsayer, allowing Lavinia to speak through her. And this very nicely mirrors the dying poet in the book who also writes Lavinia's first fictional version of herself. It brings the notion of writer as a type of 'medium' full circle, which I think isn't that far from the truth.     
Verdict: Definitely on the shelf. This is one of those books that come under Women's Literature, but so greatly differs from the genre, in that it has something for everyone. From the academically-minded, to the easy-reading type. Be assured that whatever floats your boat, Le Guin delivers.
Warnings: Apart from a little battle gore (and some very mild at that), there is nothing to worry about. 
Suggestions: Le Guin drew inspiration from 'The Aeneid' for this novel. Since the 'poet' is such an important character in the story it would be a good idea to at least attempt a reading of it. Also, my edition of the novel (Phoenix fiction) contained some really good notes at the back, which might be useful for group reading and discussions.
Favourite Excerpts: This book has so many beautiful passages. It really is a readers' delight. Here are some memorable moments that stayed with me.
"I know who I was, I can tell you who I may have been, but now I am only in this line of words I write. I’m mot sure of the nature of my existence, and wonder to find myself writing... No doubt someone with my name, Lavinia, did exist, but she may have been so different from my own idea of myself, or my poet's idea of me, that it only confuses me to think about her. As far as I know it was my poet that gave me any reality at all. Before he wrote I was the mistiest of figures, scarcely more than a name in a genealogy. It was he who brought me to life, to myself, and so made me able to remember my life and myself, which I do, vividly, with all kinds of emotions, emotions I feel strongly as I write, perhaps because the events I remember only come to exist as I write them, or as he wrote them."
"I can never get used to the fact, though I know it, that women are born cynics. Men have to learn cynicism. Infant girls could teach it to them."
"Who was my true love, then, the hero or the poet? I don't mean which of them loved me more; neither of them loved me long. Just sufficiently. Enough. My question is which of them did I more truly love? And I cannot answer it."
 "But I will not die. I cannot. I will never go down among the shadows under Albunea to see Aeneas tall among warriors, gleaming in bronze. I will not speak to Creusa of Troy, as I once thought I might, or Dido of Carthage, proud and silent, still bearing the great sword wound in her breast. They lived and died as women do and as the poet sang them. But he did not sing me enough life to die. He only gave me immortality."

Comments (15)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Great review, sounds like a very interesting book.
Great cover by the way.
http://www.ManOfLaBook.com
GREAT review! I'd definitely like to read more from Zee.
I enjoyed how you set up your review. It gives me good ideas. I also review books because I like to analyze what exactly it is that I got out of them.
This review was very well written and organized in a very readable manner. I like the book, and I really enjoyed your take on the way Le Guin treated the epic in this novel. You really articulated a lot of the things I liked when I read it about a year ago. I only have one problem with this review, and it lies in this sentence:

"Even though I'm not a big fan of Women's fiction (preferring the classics and more literary books) I found that 'Lavinia' posed some very important questions about the role of poetry."

There are two problems with this sentence. 1. Women can write both classics and literary fiction. Think of Jane Austen, the Bronte sisters, A.S. Byatt, Zora Neale Hurston, Tony Morrison, and Marion Zimmer Bradley. Just because something is written by a woman or has a woman as a main character does not mean that it isn't literary. 2. If you know anything about Le Guin, you know that she doesn't write "chick lit." She is one of the most famous and respected writers of literary science fiction in the business. I've never even heard of her being called "women's fiction" before. I am rather a fan of hers, so maybe I'm more aware of her reputation and track record than most, but it just seems strange that you feel the need to almost apologize for reading a book written by someone so well respected.

Please don't think that I mean to attack you in any way. Other than that, you write a very good review, and I would definitely read more of them. It's just comments like that one that made me start my blog in the first place, so I like to call them to people's attention when I can.
2 replies · active less than 1 minute ago
Emily! Thank you for pointing this out. I'm surprised I missed that when reading through Zee's review. Hopefully this comes to her attention.
Thanks for your comment, Emily! We are with you! And we love your blog.
Hi Emily, thank you so much for your response. I appreciate you taking the time to elaborate on what I wrote - you made a very good point. I am aware of Le Guin's fame, so I was surprised when I read 'Lavinia', because it deals very closely with topics like marriage, female subservience and male dominance. These are issues I more often associate with women's fiction as a genre of writing, not as the author's themselves. This is not a science-fiction novel and I can't put it in a Fantasy category either, which is also an area Le Guin has shown literary dexterity. So for me, it comes into an area of women's literature that deals with historical/ mythological romances - yet therein lies the problem, Le Guin's work actually defies classification. When someone breaks the novel down to it's nuts and bolts, suddenly things are not what they seem. She has woven other 'threads' into the loom, to create her own flavour of what 'women's fiction' should be like. I wish more women would write like her.

pt 1/3
I'm not apologizing for reading a book by Le Guin. I suppose I was trying to make a different point, that on first impressions a person like me (who tends to gravitate towards literary fiction and includes all the women authors you mentioned) might take this book at face-value (a historical epic romance) and walk away from it. There are definitely many levels to 'Lavinia' as a narrative.

I was by no means complaining about the author, but I won't make a secret of the fact that I tend to avoid historical romances and other more general types of fiction aimed at women. I understand that Virginia Woolf is not everyone's cup of tea, but then again neither is Barbara Cartland. Everybody has their own taste from the cerebral to the sensual, and I do not mock the people at either end of that spectrum as I'm fully aware that different people have different tastes.

pt2/3
To further clarify my usage of the word 'Women's Fiction', I think I used an unfortunate phrase, as it's caused some confusion. Fiction written BY women is one thing, after all, the novel itself was first brought to life by women writers so historically it's something to be extremely proud of. I meant to indicate that fiction 'aimed' at women with women in mind, that explore feminine issues. As you can appreciate that is a vast genre with many variants that I really should have spent a little more time thinking about. I'll be extra vigilant with my future reviews.

If anyone else took offence at my ill-structured sentence, I offer my sincerest apologies. Women writers rule!

pt 3/3 (sorry for the long post! It wouldn't let me do it in one go... man I talk too much!)
Great review Zee! You articulated well your likes and dislikes, and you chose an interesting book.
Zee, a wonderful review. I have been seeing Lavinia in bookstores for over a month now and I had been contemplating whether to buy it or not... Perhaps I should give it a once over now :)
Great review and sounds like a very interesting premise. Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for sharing your review
Wow, wonderful review! It sounds so interesting and it's incredibly hard to get nice, ancient Roman "fiction" books around. I'm surprised that my library has it! I've put it on hold. Thanks!
This sounds so interesting. I hope I win it in the Literary Giveway Blog Hop. But it's now on my TBR either way!

Post a new comment

Comments by