Thursday, March 3, 2011

Literary Blog Hop: March 3-6

Welcome to the Literary Blog Hop hosted by The Blue Bookcase!

This blog hop is open to blogs that primarily feature book reviews of literary fiction, classic literature, and general literary discussion.

How do I know if my blog qualifies as "literary"? Literature has many definitions, but for our purposes your blog qualifies as "literary" if it focuses primarily on texts with aesthetic merit. In other words, texts that show quality not only in narrative but also in the effect of their language and structure. YA literature may fit into this category, but if your blog focuses primarily on non-literary YA, fantasy, romance, paranormal romance, or chick lit, you may prefer to join the blog hop at Crazy-for-books that is open to book blogs of all kinds.

Instructions for entering the Literary Blog Hop:

1. Grab the code for the Button.

Literary Blog Hop


2. Answer the following prompt on your blog.

(Suggestions for future prompts? Email to them us at thebluebookcase@gmail.com)

Gilion from Rose City Reader asks:

Can literature be funny? What is your favorite humorous literary book?

Our answer this week comes from Lucia:

I will make the assumption that classics qualify as 'literary,' (although if you object I'd be interested to hear your argument, so please don't hesitate). I see a text as being of literary merit when there is heavy focus towards the way in which the author displays his or her ideas, through the use of language, style and structure. That being said, a dull plot remains a dull plot no matter how articulately or originally written. Should an author develop humour into their language or write in a style which is witty, sarcastic, charming, funny etc, in addition to these 'literary' qualities, logic would say that a kind of humorous literature is created. I believe that humour, in any form, can be introduced into a novel which is either literary or not. It is an addition, and not an essential quality of either. So, after all that babbling, yes, would be my answer of absolute certainty that literature can be and is, funny.

My favorite humorous literary book would be Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen. I think it is widely acknowledged that she has literary merit, and for me, that which makes her work so is in her descriptions of society and its values at the time. Austen's wit is often evident only after one has read a particular line several times (at least, that's what I find myself doing), and wondering 'why have I been drawn to this phrase more than once?' What I mean is, it's not an overt kind of language feature. Her style is sarcastic and witty, yet subtle and undistracting, which is what I love best about Austen.

3. Add your link to the Linky List below.

Happy Hopping!

Comments (31)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I don't know that i found P&P hilariously funny, though I have found it witty. It's been a long time since I've read it, though...
What a fun question for the day! It will give me something to ponder whilst I work today.
I think literature can definitely be funny. The Guernsey Potatoe Peel Society might fall under that label. Not my favorite book though. Currently reading A Reliabe Wife. Page turner but definitely NOT funny. I have a book club page on my blog with my current reads. Oh, also reading Water For Elephants right now.
My previous comment linked to the wrong blog. I don't think you want to read my math blog! I meant to invite you to visit A Healthier and Wealthier You and Me at http://www.reallifeinaminue.blogspot.com
Thanks,
Sandra
I think it's mark of great literature that there can be amusing episodes in an otherwise serious work. Look at Dickens, or Shakespeare - right up to modern writers like Julian Barnes, Philip Roth, Martin Amis. It's often the shafts of humour that make it seem real.

Thanks for hosting another blog hop - yours are wonderful for finding new blogs to read and follow.
One of these days I'm going to have room in my post-schedule to actually participate in this meme again. Ugh! I'm hoping it all evens out in March. I'm still playing catch-up right now. Anyway, love the topic, I think it's definitely possible to have comedic literary books. Examples: Cold Comfort Farm or Catch-22.
I haven't (yet) managed to read P&P but if the humor is anything like what Pride & Prejudice & Zombies has (minus the zombies of course) I'm looking forward to it. Especially the barbs between Lizzie and Darcy.
I said, absolutely yes, and especially great literature should have some humor.
Funny's as old as language itself, I say, as old as story. Humans must find laughter to sooth our daily wounds and, from Aristophanes to Anansi to Austen to Amis and Atwood, the great - as well as the good - storytellers offer it often.

My book group just picked Austen's Emma for our next read, after discussing months' worth of worthy but rather depressing texts, and I'm so pleased that you chose this topic and text as springtime begins to dawn in many lands... The perfect moment for comedy!
I'm new here. This site looks interesting. As time moves ever forward I think I am not just drawn to reading books but to reading books with a certain style. I have decided that I love language and its many uses. While I think there is a place for modern slang I firmly believe in protecting our language and its grammar. I just chose a book on grammar and a book on punctuation when most recently at the library.

I think my blog fits what you are looking for. I have a fairly diverse taste in genres. As I said, though, I like writers who have a certain panache.

Does someone wish to give me some guidance as I begin following this blog?
http://boundtogetherforgood.blogspot.com/
2 replies · active 734 weeks ago
I'm sorry if I might not have time to visit the blogs very promptly. I'm up to my eyes. But I'll get to it eventually. On the upside, there's a surprise waiting for you...
Interesting question, but it kind of surprised me. It seems to be lumping literary works into a bit of a stereotypical genre doesn't it?
2 replies · active 734 weeks ago
I just finished reading P&P with my daughter and I agree about the humor. It's clever-funny. I love Austen's wit.
Finally! One I didn't have to think about for a long time. :-)
I think it's much harder to do smart humor than smart drama. I agree with you completely about Austen.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
I left my reply on my post but the answer is: Of course! The funniest, most brilliant wits are the classical writers. I can't watch "A Midsummer's Night Dream" without my face aching from laughing afterwards.
Funny can mean so many things. Yes, Pride and Prejudice can be funny. Austen is an excellent ironist from the first sentence.
Of course literature can be funny!

My pick for funniest book? Tolstoy... Hmm...
YES, there's so much humour that a slapstick sketch is merely one sentence away.
I think that one of the best comments on humor in literature is from the essays of Addison and Steels--on the nature of humor itself. Also, as an Irish ex-pat living in the USA, aka, the diaspora, I find that there's a certain assumed duty to be funny. Read my take on this here: http://bit.ly/ecatCJ
Tristam Shandy is one of my favourite humourous books
1 reply · active 733 weeks ago
Oh no! I was in a grueling mediation last Thursday and missed my own question. Drat! I'm going to post about it today, even though I'm a week off.

Post a new comment

Comments by