Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Review: Perfect Madness by Judith Warner

Anne Taintor
Reviewed by Christina

Published: 2005

Full Title: Perfect Madness: Motherhood in the Age of Anxiety

It's about:  This righteously angry treatise explores the societal and historical pressures that create a burden of stressful expectations for middle-class mothers in America.  Ms. Warner explains how evolving parenting trends and cultural attitudes toward motherhood have culminated in our current unhealthy situation.  Working Moms and stay-at-homers alike tend toward perfectionism, continuous self-sacrifice, and ever increasing control-freakishness.  The author tells how we got here, why it's wrong, and how to fix the situation. 

I thought: Well.  I thought this was a pretty fascinating read, despite the fact that it not everything in it rings true for my generation of mommies.  The book is only seven years old, but the women quoted are closer to my mother's age than my own and the then-current statistics and situations Ms. Warner uses are from the period when I was in high school and college.  But still, I get it.  I feel for these women and their families: the endless list of "should"s, the constant procession of meaningless tasks day after day, the pain of feeling pressured to give every part of yourself to your kids.

There's some annoying melodrama in the writing style: someone's "words crackled like lightning" and sentences like "When the mommy light fades, will [the children] shiver in the dark?"  Ughhhh.  I have to fight not to snicker and/or roll my eyes when I read things like that, even if I do agree with the author's general premise and most of the arguments she makes.  People get worked up so easily about the "Mommy War" issues; there's really no need to try to pointedly ramp up the reader's emotions.  I am also not wild about the red and black cover that seems to scream "DANGER!" and "WARNING!" 

Perfect Madness is an interesting combination of forms: one-third personal essay, one-third informal history of American motherhood and feminism, and one-third reporting on and quotations from the interviews Ms. Warner held with hundreds of mothers.  The end result is 100% RANT, but since it's a rant I agree with, I didn't mind in the least.  I loved the parallels between mothering styles of the past and those of today, especially the comparisons between 1960's perfecto-moms and today's supermoms.  I think the similarities have even increased since this book was published, thanks to Mommy Blogs and the new coolness of craftiness.  And I completely agree with Judith Warner's argument that society (read: lawmakers) needs to step in and actually support families with more than lip service.  

Verdict: Stick it on the shelf!  It's not perfect, and it needs an update.  But it's still a well-written, well-researched, well-argued tract on an important subject.

Reading Recommendations: Obvs, moms will probably like this the best.  If you dig opinionated reporting and care about the lives of middle-class mothers, it's a pretty quick read.

Warnings: One chapter discusses marital sex in some detail.  One rather surprising swear word that I remember.

What I'm reading next: Then Came You by Jennifer Weiner  (my very first chick lit!)

Comments (10)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Sounds interesting.

I've had some conversations with my 90-year-old Grandmother about how I cannot stay at home and be a full time mom, and the load will be equally shared between my husband and I. She finally got her mind around it when I told her (somewhat tongue-in-cheek since this is actually a quote by Angela from "The Office") that I was a professional woman with a good career. :)

I think I'd like the subject, but I'm not sure I'm up for the rant!
1 reply · active 674 weeks ago
One of the things I liked about this book was that she did a quick rundown of what was considered the best style of parenting during each part of the twentieth century. I found myself understanding where some older relatives are coming from with their weird ideas!
Verrrry interesting. I've mentioned it before, but my MA thesis was on crazy moms - or rather the literary legacy of motherhood and how society defines "bad" and "good" moms based on these ideals. Even though that was years ago, and it kind of killed my desire to write for a long while, I still am absolutely fascinated with the sociological and literary study of mothers and motherhood. Wish this had an update. I'd love to read it, but I get annoyed with outdated studies.
1 reply · active 674 weeks ago
Woah! I don't think I knew that. What an AWESOME thesis topic. I'd love to read that!
I think Perfect Madness might still be worth checking out, since a good portion of it is dedicated to how we got to this place in our expectations of motherhood. Learning that history was one of my favorite things about it.
I read this one several years ago and although I'm usually very interested in these issues, I was kind of irritated by the same things that bothered you. I felt like Warner was talking about a whole different population of moms, even though my own group certainly has many of the same problems (although TBH not living in a large, affluent city helps a lot!) So it wasn't my favorite Warner book.

Last year I read her new title, "We've Got Issues," and I have to tell you, it is really good.
3 replies · active 673 weeks ago
Oooh, I'll have to check it out! It's about the overprescription of behavioral meds for children, right?
But yeah, reading Perfect Madness did make me appreciate my small, reasonably-priced and relatively laid-back city! She makes parenting in D.C. and NYC sound like a whole new kind of nightmare.
Well, her project started off about overprescription. It turned into a much more careful survey of childhood mental issues and what is currently possible in terms of therapy and treatment and all sorts of things.

One thing she talked about that I really appreciated was the way we blame parents--esp. mothers--for everything. If a child has ADHD/depression/bipolar/something really severe, or for that matter allergies or cancer or almost anything else, we blame the mother. We used to do it with autism and homosexuality too, and now with vax deniers, we're getting back to blaming mothers for autism. ANYWAY Warner points out how much of that is a defense mechanism--we just love to blame mothers for children's problems, because that makes them *bad* mothers and we are (or would be) *good* mothers, which would keep us and our children safe from having problems. Of course that is rank superstition, and in fact the best parents in the world can easily have a child with severe issues; life is just something of a lottery that way. But that is too scary for us to face most of the time--it's easier to blame people.
That sounds fantastic. Adding it to my wishlist now. Thanks!
And yeah, the tendency to blame the mother disturbs me, too, and I know what you/she mean(s) about it being an irrational way to ward of misfortune. We all want to believe that we can do everything right and everything will be perfect, and the flipside of that is blaming the victim (or the victim's mother).
Your first chick lit EVER? Or just for this blog?
1 reply · active 673 weeks ago
EVER! I'm such a square!

Post a new comment

Comments by