Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Review: The Casual Vacancy by JK Rowling

Rowling's first book for adults
Reviewed by Connie
*I received a complimentary review copy of this book in exchange for an honest review

Published: 2012

It's about: (taken from GoodReads) "When Barry Fairbrother dies in his early forties, the town of Pagford is left in shock. Pagford is, seemingly, an English idyll, with a cobbled market square and an ancient abbey, but what lies behind the pretty façade is a town at war. Rich at war with poor, teenagers at war with their parents, wives at war with their husbands, teachers at war with their pupils...Pagford is not what it first seems. And the empty seat left by Barry on the parish council soon becomes the catalyst for the biggest war the town has yet seen. Who will triumph in an election fraught with passion, duplicity and unexpected revelations?"

I thought: This book, Rowling's first since the final Harry Potter was published in 2007, has been received thus far with mixed reviews, which I wish to address before offering my opinion of the book.

Many of the negative reviews I have read have thus far have been from Harry Potter fans disappointed that this book is nothing like Harry Potter. Well, guess what, JK Rowling never intended this book to be anything like Harry Potter. Other reviewers have said that the adult content in the book is Rowling's awkward attempt to push as far away from Potter as possible, as though she has something to prove. This, also, is unfair, as it assumes that the more optimistic, kid-friendly, clean style of Harry Potter is the only writing style that comes instinctively to Rowling, and anything else is forced, a sort of teenage rebellion against her "goody goody" Harry Potter days.

Few readers seem to be considering the possibility that maybe, just maybe, Ms. Rowling has more to say about the world than she said in Harry Potter. That she does not go around seeing things exclusively through Dumbledore's half-moon spectacles, interpreting everything she encounters in terms of herbology and wands and dementors. The Casual Vacancy certainly takes a different (and undeniably bleaker) perspective on life, but it should not be written off as inauthentic simply because it differs so greatly from the tone of her previous works.

Now, one comment I will make, which will be the only Potter-Vacancy connection I point out, is that I love the way Rowling rotates the narrative perspective from one character to another throughout this book. She did this at times in Potter (when she wrote from the perspective of Frank, the gardener, or the Muggle Prime Minister), and I always thoroughly enjoyed those bits. She demonstrated a knack for the style in those brief glimpses in Potter, and now, having written an entire 500-page book exclusively in that fashion, her superior talent truly shines.

Rowling has said that this format is her attempt to modernize nineteenth century novels that center in a small town or village. This much is clear. The Casual Vacancy certainly follows in the vein of George Eliot's Middlemarch or any one of Thomas Hardy's novels, and she does the genre justice.

The characters of Pagford are varied, real, and flawed. Though very few of them are actually likable, Rowling writes them with insight, demonstrating an intuitive understanding of people's thought patterns and justifications for their actions. It is truly refreshing, as so many of us are confined to think only as we think without ever successfully putting ourselves in the places of those around us.

The irony of the book, and ultimately what makes it so powerful, is that while Rowling successfully writes from the perspectives of so many characters, thus following the advice to "walk a mile in someone's shoes," none of the characters she writes is ever capable of doing the same.

To me, this is the dominant theme of the book -- the tragedy of missed opportunity. So many times throughout the novel, characters have an opportunity to help or reach out to or really communicate with another character, and pretty much every time, they don't engage. Each character is a megalomaniac of sorts, so tied up with the universe that centers around himself, that no one is able to form any real human connections. That's why Barry Fairbrother's death leaves such a gaping hole in the town of Pagford; he seems to have been the only one capable of doing that.

Though the book is certainly bleak, it ultimately is a book of great compassion. The Casual Vacancy is a book of believable characters, expert writing, and plenty of Rowling's cheeky humor to mix things up.

Verdict: Stick it on the shelf

Reading Recommendations: It would not be accurate to suggest that if you loved Harry Potter, you'll love The Casual Vacancy. I'd say a more appropriate recommendation would be if you like the novels of Ian McEwan (Atonement, Saturday), you will probably enjoy The Casual Vacancy.

Warnings: strong language, sexual content, drug use, rape

Favorite excerpts:
"Krystal's slow passage up the school had resembled the passage of a goat through the body of a boa constrictor, being highly visible and uncomfortable for both parties concerned."

"It was so good to be held. If only their relationship could be distilled into simple, wordless gestures of comfort. Why had humans ever learned to talk?"

"Ever since Barry's funeral, Gavin had dwelled, with a sense of deep inadequacy, on the comparatively small gap that he was sure he would leave behind in his community, should he die. Looking at Mary, he wondered whether it would not be better to leave a huge hole in one person's heart."

"What was love, after all? Thought Parminder, as a gentle breeze ruffled the tall hedge of Leyland cypresses that enclosed the Jawandas' backyard. Was it love when somebody filled a space in your life that yawned inside you, once they had gone?"

What I'm reading next: The Mask of Motherhood by Susan Maushart

Comments (19)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Brilliant review! I'm so glad you liked it- I've been wondering what your reaction would be given the mixed reviews elsewhere.
Something about this reminds me a little of Zadie Smith's books. Have you read anything by her? I could be way out in left field, of course, since I haven't actually read The Casual Vacancy.
1 reply · active 651 weeks ago
Thanks, Christina! I have not read any of Zadie Smith's books, so I can't say one way or another if it's like them. What makes you think they might be?
Superb review! I love your approach and your unprejudiced summary.

I am currently reading The Casual Vacancy and am approaching it from the same standpoint as you. It cannot be compared to Harry Potter, being a distinctly different genre. What I am hoping to see is the genius of the author shining through the text. I'm sure she will not disappoint.
1 reply · active 651 weeks ago
Shirley, good for you. So many people are wasting their time with this book going into it with unrealistic expectations. Be sure to stop by after you finish and let me know if you ended up liking it.
Great job Connie! This is really a great review. I have to wait a week before I can start borrowing books from the store but this is going to be the FIRST one.
3 replies · active 651 weeks ago
You get to borrow books from the store?! SWEET!!
I KNOW! Up to 3 at a time!!!
Sweet. I am curious to see what you think of it! I have a feeling you will like it. But who knows.
I have to say, I do think that she is pushing the envelope, and pushing out of the shadow of Harry Potter, but I don't think that means she's being fake with her writing. In fact, I just believe that she has other sides to her, as we all do, and that she is showing us that other side. It happens to be maybe more of an edgy side, which is fine. Everyone has the PG and the R parts of their personalities and I think that's where this book comes from, just another part of her personality.
1 reply · active 651 weeks ago
Yep, that's exactly the point I was trying to convey in this review. Just because it's a different Rowling than we've yet seen doesn't make it inauthentic. I think people are so fond of Potter they feel a sense of ownership over the books and, apparently, the author, that they KNOW JK Rowling, and this is not the JK Rowling they KNOW.
Casey Van Wagenen's avatar

Casey Van Wagenen · 652 weeks ago

So glad you reviewed this book. Now I can get it for my kindle.
1 reply · active 651 weeks ago
Awesome, come back after you read it and weigh in.
I am hoping to start this one later tonight. I have to say I have bought it purely out of a jumping on the band wagon sense of curiosity. However as I have never read (or wanted to) Harry Potter I'm not sure what my expectations are. Rather looking forward to it though - as it will be different to the books I often read.
1 reply · active 651 weeks ago
Oooh make sure you do come back and let me know. I don't think I've read a review yet from someone who HASN'T read Harry Potter. I'm interested to hear your perspective.
This is probably the best, and most convincing, review of The Casual Vacancy I've read until now. As a Harry Potter fan who enjoys the books in large part because of Rowling's distinct writing style (which, from excerpts, I've already recognized in The Casual Vacancy) and that occasional character focus shift, I can see that there are objective justifications for wanting to read this one. And a novel in the vein of Middlemarch? Hard to pass that up.
1 reply · active 651 weeks ago
Thank you very much! Yes, I think if you are drawn to Rowling for her writing style and shifting characters, you should enjoy this book, as she shines with both. Be sure to come back if you end up reading it and let me know what you think!
I'm reading this one now, and I'm struggling with it. My main struggle is the cast of characters. I'm hoping to get them all sorted out soon. I went into the book with no expectations, and knowing it would be different. If it wasn't J K Rowling, I would probably have moved on my now, I'm really hoping the book picks up soon.

I'm a new follower! Great blog.
I'm reading contrary reviews for this book and liking it more and more. So many different views is always a good thing. Thank you for your review. I am intrigued particularly after Harry how does one break the mould and move into something else.
I've just finished reviewing this, and I would completely agree with your opening comments - I find the whole idea of comparing this to the Potter books objectionable, and really can't see how comparing them in anyway has merit in a review. However, I didn't enjoy the book as much as you and actually found the writing incredibly dull. If Rowling was attempting to update the village novel, I really felt she needed more complexity not just an updating of tone. Enjoyed the review, thanks.

Post a new comment

Comments by