Showing posts with label Meagan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Meagan. Show all posts

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Reading List: World War One

Welcome to this week's installment of our newest feature here at The Blue Bookcase: Reading Lists. Every week one of us (or a guest blogger) will post on one of his or her favorite topics and provide a list of books he or she is familiar with on that topic. At the end of each post we will invite you to throw out any suggestions of books, fiction or non-fiction, that you have read or know about on that topic and we will add them to the list on that post.

These lists are not comprehensive by any means, but may be useful in helping you find your next read. Enjoy!

This week, Meagan is compiling a list of books about World War One
.



I've been interested in WWI ever since I was a young girl living in England. The way The Great War was so completely woven into the fabric of British culture was fascinating to me as an American ex-pat as it seems to be barely a thread in American history.  When I was in college I spent a semester back in London and took a class called "The Great War and Modernism" which involved a study of the various cultural and social elements of the war and its aftermath and included several visits to various battlefields and memorials throughout Europe which only made my interest all the more intense. I returned to England yet again for Grad School and yet again WWI and the aftermath of the interwar years claimed much of my attention. I'd be hard pressed to name another event or time period that was so drastically formative to the years--even decades--that followed, and that fact continues to draw me in to examine facet after facet of WWI.


My interest in WWI literature is more focused on the experience of war rather than straightforward military histories so while I have read a lot about the various battles and campaigns in detail, I'm only including one general survey of the war that I found particularly helpful in gaining a general sense of events. The rest of the list is a pretty random sampling of some of my favorite reads on the subject. The encompass poetry, memoirs, studies, facts, and fictions. Many were written during the war or shortly thereafter, but there are several with much more recent publication dates which only goes to show just how strong the pull to understand this tumultuous time period still is.


I can't wait to hear your suggestions!


My List
The First World War - John Keegan
"The First World War created the modern world. A conflict of unprecedented ferocity, it abruptly ended the relative peace and prosperity of the Victorian era, unleashing such demons of the twentieth century as mechanized warfare and mass death. It also helped to usher in the ideas that have shaped our times—modernism in the arts, new approaches to psychology and medicine, radical thoughts about economics and society—and in so doing shattered the faith in rationalism and liberalism that had prevailed in Europe since the Enlightenment. With The First World War, John Keegan, one of our most eminent military historians, fulfills a lifelong ambition to write the definitive account of the Great War for our generation." (Goodreads)

Remembering War
 - Jay Winter

"This is a masterful volume on remembrance and war in the twentieth century. Jay Winter locates the fascination with the subject of memory within a long-term trajectory that focuses on the Great War. Images, languages, and practices that appeared during and after the two world wars focused on the need to acknowledge the victims of war and shaped the ways in which future conflicts were imagined and remembered. At the core of the “memory boom” is an array of collective meditations on war and the victims of war, Winter says." (Goodreads)


A Testament of Youth - Vera Brittain
"Much of what we know and feel about the First World War we owe to Vera Brittain’s elegiac yet unsparing book, which set a standard for memoirists from Martha Gellhorn to Lillian Hellman. Abandoning her studies at Oxford in 1915 to enlist as a nurse in the armed services, Brittain served in London, in Malta, and on the Western Front. By war’s end she had lost virtually everyone she loved. Testament of Youth is both a record of what she lived through and an elegy for a vanished generation. Hailed by the Times Literary Supplement as a book that helped “both form and define the mood of its time,” it speaks to any generation that has been irrevocably changed by war." (Goodreads)


Good-bye To All That - Robert Graves
"The quintessential memoir of the generation of Englishmen who suffered in World War I is among the bitterest autobiographies ever written. Robert Graves's stripped-to-the-bone prose seethes with contempt for his class, his country, his military superiors, and the civilians who mindlessly cheered the carnage from the safety of home. His portrait of the stupidity & petty cruelties endemic in England's elite schools is almost as scathing as his depiction of trench warfare. Nothing could equal Graves's bone-chilling litany of meaningless death, horrific encounters with gruesomely decaying corpses & even more appalling confrontations with the callousness & arrogance of the military command." (Goodreads)






All Quiet On The Western Front - Erich Remarque
"This 1929 novel served as Remarque's attempt to confront and ultimately rid himself of the graphic and haunting memories of his time serving in World War I. A novel with autobiographical overtones, "All Quiet on the Western Front" traces the evolution of one man's powerful antiwar sentiments. " (Goodreads)

 A Farewell to Arms - Ernest Hemingway
"In 1918 Ernest Hemingway went to war, to the 'war to end all wars'. He volunteered for ambulance service in Italy, was wounded and twice decorated. Out of his experiences came A Farewell to Arms. Hemingway's description of war is unforgettable. He recreates the fear, the comradeship, the courage of his young American volunteer and the men and women he meets in Italy with total conviction. But A Farewell to Arms is not only a novel of war. In it Hemingway has also created a love story of immense drama and uncompromising passion. " (Goodreads)




The Wordsworth Book of First World War Poetry - VariousThe First World War was one of seemingly endless and unremitting waste and sacrifice. "Who will remember, passing through this Gate, The unheroic Dead who fed the guns? "was Siegfried Sassoon's anguished cry for those whose sacrifice seemed futile. Yet eighty years later it is because of Sassoon and his fellow poets - Owen, Rosenberg, Sorley and many others - that we do remember. This new anthology will serve as an introduction to the poetry of that great conflict, and the inclusion of a number of rarely anthologised poets, many from the ranks, as well as anonymous poems and songs, serves to bring a quality of freshness to the selection." (Goodreads)



Rilla of Ingleside - L.M. Montgomery
"Anne's children were almost grown up, except for pretty, high-spirited Rilla. No one could resist her bright hazel eyes and dazzling smile. Rilla, almost fifteen, can't think any further ahead than going to her very first dance at the Four Winds lighthouse and getting her first kiss from handsome Kenneth Ford. But undreamed-of challenges await the irrepressible Rilla when the world of Ingleside becomes endangered by a far-off war. Her brothers go off to fight, and Rilla brings home an orphaned newborn in a soup tureen. She is swept into a drama that tests her courage and leaves her changed forever." (Goodreads)


Birdsong
 - Sebastian Faulks

"The book's hero, a 20-year-old Englishman named Stephen Wraysford, finds his true love on a trip to Amiens in 1910. Unfortunately, she's already married; the wife of a wealthy textile baron. Wrayford convinces her to leave a life of passionless comfort to be at his side, but things do not turn out according to plan. Wraysford is haunted by this doomed affair, and carries it with him into the trenches of World War I. Birdsong derives most of its power from its descriptions of mud and blood, and Wraysford's attempt to retain a scrap of humanity while surrounded by it." (Goodreads)
War Horse - Michael Morpurgo
"Joey is a warhorse, but he wasn't always. Once, he was a farm horse and a gentle boy named Albert was his master. Then World War I came storming through and everything changed. Albert's father sells Joey to the army where the beautiful, red-bay horse is trained to charge the enemy, drag heavy artillery, and carry wounded soldiers not much older than Albert off of battlefields. Amongst the clamoring of guns and slogging through the cold mud, Joey wonders if the war will ever end. And if it does, will he ever find Albert again?" (Goodreads)





 Maisie Dobbs - Jaqueline Winspear
"Maisie Dobbs isn't just any young housemaid. Through her own natural intelligence--and the patronage of her benevolent employers--she works her way into college at Cambridge. When World War I breaks out, Maisie goes to the front as a nurse. It is there that she learns that coincidences are meaningful and the truth elusive. After the War, Maisie sets up on her own as a private investigator. But her very first assignment, seemingly an ordinary infidelity case, soon reveals a much deeper, darker web of secrets, which will force Maisie to revisit the horrors of the Great War and the love she left behind." (Goodreads)








Your Recommendations:
Tell me in the comments. And please provide links to your own reviews!


Do you consider yourself particularly well-read on a certain topic? Or maybe you find yourself drawn to books about specific people, places, or things? We would love to have you write a Reading List post for us! If you are interested please email us at thebluebookcase@gmail.com.

Thursday, October 6, 2011

Literary Blog Hop: Oct 6-9

Welcome to the Literary Blog Hop hosted by The Blue Bookcase!

This monthly blog hop is open to blogs that primarily feature book reviews of literary fiction, classic literature, and general literary discussion.

How do I know if my blog qualifies as "literary"? Literature has many definitions, but for our purposes your blog qualifies as "literary" if it focuses primarily on texts with aesthetic merit. In other words, texts that show quality not only in narrative but also in the effect of their language and structure. YA literature may fit into this category, but if your blog focuses primarily on non-literary YA, fantasy, romance, paranormal romance, or chick lit, you may prefer to join the blog hop at Crazy-for-books that is open to book blogs of all kinds.

Instructions for entering the Literary Blog Hop:

1. Grab the code for the Button.

Literary Blog Hop




2. Answer the following prompt on your blog.
(Suggestions for future prompts? Email to them us at thebluebookcase@gmail.com)

Our question this week comes from Mel u over at The Reading Life:

When I was in my early teens I read a book called Van Loon's Lives by Hendrick Willlem Van Loon. It was written in 1942 (Van Loon was a Newberry Winner for another work). I was maybe ten or so when I first read it and I was totally fascinated. The story line is that Von Loon and his good friend found a magic way to invite three famous literary figures from different eras for a Sunday Dinner. The book gives mini bios of the guests, explains the food the would have wanted and shows their dinner conversations. If you could invite any three literary figures from different eras to a Sunday Dinner who would they be? Magic takes care of the language issues.

Our answer comes from Meagan:

Wow, can I first just say why have I not read this book? It sounds amazing! I read Van Loon's The Story of Mankind a few years back when I made a goal to read all the Newbery Award-winning books and remember really, really liking it so I'm really excited to hunt this one down!

Secondly, asking me to narrow down a dinner party to only three authors is like asking me what my favorite book is. Unlike Highlander, there can't be only one (or in this case three). I spent the last couple days imagining various guest lists and came up with so many I almost gave up and picked another topic! I had lists of guests for talking about philosophy, politics, religion, various periods in history, various literary movements, various genres, etc., etc. I even had a few lists that merely served to satisfy my curiosity about the real identity of some oft-debated authors (Shakespeare, the authors of the Bible, Anonymous :) So suffice it to say I can't WAIT to hear about all your choices!

In the end, I decided to make my choices around the type of dinner party I most enjoy: the perfect mix of clever conversation and raucous laughter. With that in mind, I decided to invite Oscar Wilde, Jane Austen, and Theodor Geisel. Now let me tell you why.

Oscar Wilde - Master of Aphorisms and Epigrams (I'm still not entirely sure what the difference is). Everything he wrote had such polish and panache I can just imagine him tying any thread of conversation off in a thoroughly humorous yet sharply insightful bow. His major talent was tackling big, serious issues in such a flamboyant and seemingly superficial way so that the butt of his jokes was certain to be so offended by his manner that the meat of his criticisms would sail right past to the intended audience. I've always imagined Lord Goring from An Ideal Husband to be as close to an autobiography as Wilde ever got and can think of nothing better than having him sitting across the table passing the scones and cucumber sandwiches.

Jane Austen - Before you go off rolling your eyes at one girl's obsession with Jane Austen, let me just say one thing: Yes, I am a devout Austenite, but, BUT, I would be happy to have her as a dinner guest even if not one word were spoken about any of her novels. I do think she has a spectacular knack for social commentary and subtle humor, but the reason she earns a seat at the table is for her -- and I use this term in the loosest sense -- nonfiction. Never am I so delighted by Jane Austen as when I'm reading things in her voice. The few letters to her family that survive, her childhood notebooks, all are fascinating. But my favorite of all is her History of England which she wrote around the age of 15 as a 'partial, prejudiced and ignorant Historian' and had her sister illustrate (the link shows the actual manuscript). The work is a perfect parody of the dry accounting of English history common in primary schools, and as I was a victim, er, student of the system, I can appreciate anything that spiced up dullness of the English monarchy. Her barbs and jabs at highly regarded historical figures and political situations would serve as the cream of the meal.

Theodor Geisel - And to round out the party, it's always good to have a doctor in the house, and Dr. Seuss is one of the best. No author I know takes himself less seriously (I mean, cats in ridiculous hats? wockets in pockets? utter chaos on Mulberry Street? Need I go on?) and the ability to laugh at oneself is just as important as the ability to laugh at one's situation. He also has the ability to couch his commentary in a friendlier guise and If ever the conversation grew too serious, he could immediately get us back on track by inventing a new creature as a topic of conversation. I think he would serve as a good foil to the more "literary" reputation of my other guests, but there is also an element of his humor that rings true to the Brits'. And he would not put a strain on my culinary skills by of course being perfectly happy with green eggs and ham!

So, would you want to come to my dinner party? Would I want to come to yours?

3. Add your link to the Linky List below.Happy Hopping!
*PLEASE NOTE: if you do not answer the question and link back to The Blue Bookcase in a post on your blog, you will be removed from the Linky list.

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Review: The Bean Trees by Barbara Kingsolver

Reviewed by Meagan
Published: 1988
It's about: Marietta Greer was born and raised in rural Kentucky, but her plan is to get out as soon as she can. Unlike most of the girls her age, she avoids getting pregnant, gets herself a good job, and finally saves up enough money to buy an old VW Bug. She hits the road, changes her name to "Taylor" after one of the towns she passes through, and proceeds to drive across the country.
The car is, of course, unreliable, and through a series of breakdowns, Taylor's life is changed forever. In the Cherokee Nation in Oklahoma, she is given a young toddler girl by a woman claiming to be the child's aunt. Not knowing what else to do, Taylor takes her on the road. She discovers the girl (whom she names "Turtle" because of her penchant for grabbing at anything within her reach) has been abused and become fiercely protective of her.
The two eventually break down in Tuscon, Arizona and begin to build a life and create a family of characters including another Kentucky transplant, the female owner of the Jesus is Lord Used Tires store, and a Guatemalan couple seeking political asylum. Together this unexpected group explores themes of family, life, death, beauty, friendship, hope, and love.

Saturday, September 10, 2011

Review: Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand

Reviewed by Meagan

Published: 1957

It's about: This book is a million pages long, so I browsed a few summaries online and am stealing the summary off Wikipedia:

"The book explores a dystopian United States where leading innovators, ranging from industrialists to artists, refuse to be exploited by society. The protagonistDagny Taggart, sees society collapse around her as the government increasingly asserts control over all industry (including Taggart Transcontinental, the once mighty transcontinental railroad for which she serves as the Vice President of Operations), while society's most productive citizens, led by the mysterious John Galt, progressively disappear. Galt describes the strike as "stopping the motor of the world" by withdrawing the "minds" that drive society's growth and productivity. In their efforts, these people "of the mind" hope to demonstrate that a world in which the individual is not free to create is doomed, that civilization cannot exist where people are slaves to society and government, and that the destruction of the profit motive leads to the collapse of society."

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Review: War on the Margins by Libby Cone

Reviewed by Meagan

Published: 2009

It's about: Amazon.com offers a great summary: "France has fallen to the Nazis. Britain is under siege. As BBC bulletins grow bleak, residents of Jersey abandon their homes in their thousands. When the Germans take over, Marlene Zimmer, a shy clerk at the Aliens Office, must register her friends and neighbours as Jews while concealing her own heritage, until eventually she is forced to flee. Layers of extraordinary history unfold as we chart Marlene's transformation from unassuming office worker to active Resistance member under the protection of artists Claude Cahun and Marcel Moore, who manage to find poetry in the midst of hardship and unimaginable danger. Drawn from authentic World War II documents, broadcasts and private letters, "War on the Margins" tells the unforgettable story of the deepening horror of the Nazi regime in Jersey and the extraordinary bravery of those who sought to subvert it."

I thought: When I was introduced to this book as a fictional account of the Channel Island of Jersey during the German Occupation, I, of course, immediately thought of The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society which, if you haven't read it, takes place on Guernsey in the Channel Islands during the same time period. Readers looking for the same elements that feature in Guernsey won't find very many in War on the Margins. The epistolary format, poetic language, the vibrant and dynamic fictional characters, for example, are not present. But this doesn't mean that War on the Margins isn't just as readable. Based on the author's thesis, the novel is steeped in historical facts. Actual communications between Germany and Jersey are included and several of the characters portrayed really existed. These factors made the book read less like a novel and more like a historical article--a little drier, perhaps, but all the more fascinating given its non-fictional  basis. I found several of the details of the lives of the Channel Islands residents during the occupation fascinating and it made me want to learn more about this forgotten part of war history.

Verdict: Stick it on the shelf or Rubbish Bin? In-between. The read was supremely interesting and spurred me to look for additional reading material in the genre, but I'm not sure I'd feel the need to revisit the novel again. 

Reading Recommendations: If WWII is a topic that interests you, or if Guernsey whetted your appetite about the German Occupation of the Channel Islands, this novel provides excellent and interesting details. Also, as far as I know, a paperback version of the book is only available in England, but there is an Amazon Kindle version available in the US.

Warnings: Nothing I can really think of. There are of course illusions to many of the travesties of war, but nothing too overtly graphic.

Favorite excerptsWar is not neat and tidy.


Everywhere the Germans communicated the message “We Own You".

Not a word about the occupied Islands, though everyone yearned not to be forgotten. Which was worse: to flee into Underground tunnels most nights and sit in the damp as the bombs thudded down, or to see one's street overrun with German soldiers and vehicles, and the sunny beaches pockmarked with mines? To have to watch one's step, hold one's breath, keep a pleasant face so as not to upset the wrong person and end up in prison? To find you couldn't trust your local government?

What I'm reading next: Everything Beautiful Began After by Simon Van Booy

Thursday, June 9, 2011

Literary Blog Hop: June 9-11

Welcome to the Literary Blog Hop hosted by The Blue Bookcase!

This blog hop is open to blogs that primarily feature book reviews of literary fiction, classic literature, and general literary discussion.

How do I know if my blog qualifies as "literary"? Literature has many definitions, but for our purposes your blog qualifies as "literary" if it focuses primarily on texts with aesthetic merit. In other words, texts that show quality not only in narrative but also in the effect of their language and structure. YA literature may fit into this category, but if your blog focuses primarily on non-literary YA, fantasy, romance, paranormal romance, or chick lit, you may prefer to join the blog hop at Crazy-for-books that is open to book blogs of all kinds.

Instructions for entering the Literary Blog Hop:

1. Grab the code for the Button.

Literary Blog Hop




2. Answer the following prompt on your blog.
(Suggestions for future prompts? Email to them us at thebluebookcase@gmail.com)

What other outside influences affect your reading experience? Do you think these influences enhance or detract from the experience?.

Our answer comes from Meagan:
First off let me confess that I made this question up because I wanted to answer it. I don't know if that counts as cheating or what but my last Blog Hop post focused on how the "status" of a book (e.g. Is it a bestseller? Is it a classic? etc.) affected my opinion of it and I really liked that discussion so it was on my mind when I had an experience that made we want to continue it, but in a slightly different direction.

So we all know that no man is an island, and I think the same idea applies to books--they just don't exist in a vacuum. Each reader has experiences, prejudices, and beliefs to bring to the table. (Wow, how many mixed metaphors can I include in one sentence?) Like we discussed earlier this year, a book's status can affect our reading, and recommendations, cultural phenomena, social issues, and previous works by the author are just a few of the other influences I find often playing a part in my reading experience.

Sometimes these influences detract--like if a book is talked up so much by a friend that by the time I read it its reputation overshadows it in actuality and I finish it feeling disappointed in a way that I might not have had I stumbled across it on my own with no other references. Sometimes these influences enhance. I know I've mentioned many times before how much I enjoy reading about WWI, and both the knowledge I have of the War from previous reading, and the personal experiences I've had walking many of the battle fields and visiting countless memorials make my experience with each new read that much richer.

Obviously the outside influences on a book are rarely cut and dried, and sometimes the variety of influences that both enhance and detract color the reading experience in strange and unexpected ways.

For example:

My family has a mother-daughter book group where we each take a turn choosing a book to read and plan a relevant activity to discuss it. Last month my little sister chose The Secret Garden, a book I hadn't read in years and years. We had to have our meeting early in the month so I hadn't finished the book (or honestly even started it) and for the activity we watched the 1987 Hallmark Hall of Fame version of the film (mostly because it has a delicious cameo from a very young Colin Firth). It was a passable adaptation and followed the story line fairly well except for perhaps five minutes of film depicting the children when they've grown up (enter Colin Firth as Colin). It's a nice gesture to round out the story in the way the book does not, but I found it unexpectedly and profoundly affected my experience when I actually read the book later in the month.

The scene shows Mary driving back to Misselthwaite Manor. She's dressed in a WWI uniform with a field nurse band encircling her arm. The makes her way to the Secret Garden where she meets a delighted Ben Weatherstaff who has been tending the garden during the war. He laments the loss of Dickon who was killed in action in the Argonne Forest and Mary replies, "If Dickon had to die, he would have chosen a place where there were green and growing things." They are then joined by a grown Colin dressed in an officer's uniform and walking with a cane and limp from a shrapnel wound. He proposes, she accepts, and the movie ends with a sun-drenched panorama of the garden.

Sounds lovely, right? It's nice to know what happens after a "Happily Ever After", right? I'm not so sure.

On a completely superficial note, I always wanted Mary to end up with Dickon (though Colin didn't age half-bad), so that was a little disappointing. However, the WWI elements were nothing less than heartbreaking to me. As I read about these happy, innocent children, I couldn't help but mourn the future before them. And having walked through the still-scarred Argonne and seeing photographs of the wasteland it was during the war Mary's naive comment adds another layer of pain to Dickon's last moments. But on the other hand, imagining the experiences they would have later in life made their pure joy in tending the garden that much sweeter and the garden became in my mind even more of a blessing than it is depicted in the novel.

The Secret Garden was published serially in 1910 and in novel form the next year, so Burnett wouldn't have had any notion of what was shortly to happen to the world, yet the influence of one film adaptation, my own interest in and experience with early 20th century history dramatically changed my experience reading it. I'm still not sure if I liked these influences, but they are definitely something to think about.

So what do you think about these outside influences?

3. Add your link to the Linky List below.Happy Hopping!

*PLEASE NOTE: if you do not answer the question and link back to The Blue Bookcase in a post on your blog, you will be removed from the Linky list.

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Review: A Room of One's Own by Virginia Woolf


Reviewed by Meagan as part of the Year of Feminist Classics

Published: 1929

It's about: A Room of One's Own is an essay which expands on two lectures Virginia Woolf gave at Newnham and Girton colleges on the topic of "Women and Fiction". The book recounts Woolf's path of research as she considers this broad topic and comes to the conclusion that  "a woman must have money and a room of her own if she is to write fiction."

I thought: First, I just want to apologize for sneaking this in at the last second. I had much better intentions but my procrastination has resulted in a very jumbled review. So sorry (: Anyway, a section in the forward of my edition of this book sums up the largest portion of my objections to Woolf's thesis: "A Room of One's Own opened Woolf up to the charges--snobbery, aestheticism--by that time habitually laid at the Bloomsbury gate... To an extent, the accusations are just; Woolf is concerned with the fate of women of genius, not with that of ordinary women; her plea is that we create a world in which Shakespeare's sister might survive her gift, not one in which a miner's wife can have her rights to property; her passion is for literature, not for universal justice."

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Review: Dreadfully Ever After by Steve Hockensmith

Reviewed by Meagan

Published: 2011

It's about: In 2009, the Undead gained new life when Quirk Books began publishing mashup stories that combined literary classics with various mythical or otherwise unlikely creatures. The first of these combinations was entitled Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. Despite the truly terrible plot, the adaptation achieved astronomical levels of success including being #27 on amazon.co.uk's bestseller list and #3 on the New York Times bestseller list (at least that's what Wikipedia says :). The popularity of Elizabeth Bennet as zombie hunter prompted first a sequel entitled Pride and Prejudice: Dawn of the Dreadfuls, published in 2010, and then this newest addition as the third in the trilogy. As the novel begins, Elizabeth and Darcy have enjoyed four years of married life, but the social customs that dictate that a married woman cannot hunt zombies has Elizabeth in a bit of a blue mood. Luckily for her, Darcy promptly gets himself bitten and Elizabeth is forced to trust him to the care of Lady Catherine De Bourgh and travel to London to seek a possible cure before it's too late. Mr. Bennet, Kitty, Mary, several ninjas, a man in a dog-drawn box on wheels, and King George III all feature in the adventure.

I thought: So I'll admit that when I first heard of these Jane Austen mashups a couple years ago, I was pretty dismissive. The idea was so utterly ridiculous I couldn't even work up enough energy to be incensed about Jane's words being subjected to such treatment. I would obviously never read such trash so I shrugged my shoulders and promptly forgot about them. However, in the following months, several friends whose opinions I respect mentioned reading these collaborations and remarked on their surprise at actually enjoying them. I remained disbelieving, but enough of a seed was planted in my mind that when the opportunity arose to review the newest work, I jumped on it.

I had grand plans to read at least Pride and Prejudice and Zombies before attempting the sequel, but time and the surprisingly long waiting list at my local library put an end to them, so I just took a deep breath and jumped in. And you know what? Hilarious. As I began reading, I turned the bottom corner up on pages with passages I found particularly entertaining, but quickly found that I was marking almost every page! As a lover of all things Jane Austen, I am always looking for a satisfying continuance of Elizabeth and Darcy's story, but have yet to only find attempts that are at best mediocre and at worst so odious I literally threw the book across the room in disgust. At last! Here was a sequel that passed muster! Sure there are some problems. Why in the world would Mr. Bennet's Christian name be Oscar? And I think the author misread Mary's quelling interjections in the Austen's original work. To me they were based on a rigorously religious and devout disposition but in this novel she is portrayed as a raging feminist. Kitty does well for herself though, and I was glad to see her become her own person once removed from Lydia's obnoxiously overpowering shadow.

Of course the entire story is ridiculously implausible. Of course every character, action, and description has to be taken completely superficially. Approaching the story with any degree of seriousness will only bring you pain. But somehow the utter lack of legitimacy works for me. If I were to write a book portraying the least likely scenario of Elizabeth and Darcy's married life, I doubt it would look much different than this novel. And yet, this novel is the least noxious depiction of that life that I have ever come across.

Verdict: Stick it on the shelf or Rubbish Bin? In between. I had a ball reading this one, and have since checked out the first two in the series and have a hold on Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters, but I have a feeling these are more of a one-time indulgence. Although it might be entertaining to watch people's reactions when they see this novel shoved between Jane Austen and Henry James...

Reading Recommendations: Although I didn't read Pride and Prejudice and Zombies before reading Dreadfully Ever After I think it would have helped a little if I had. There are quite a few allusions to plot lines and actions from the previous books that I could somewhat understand, but I'm sure would make much more sense with the right context.

Warnings: The violence in this book is very straightforward and no-nonsense, but there is a great deal of butchery and braining going on so if that doesn't appeal to you I'd move on to something else...

Favorite excerpts: Like I said before, there were tons of great lines, but here's a sampling of what to expect:

"They were a motley assortment, fresh next to rancid, rag-shrouded beside fashionably clothed, all united in the democracy of death."

"Dead flesh lay ahead. The kind that gets up and walks around and tries to make more dead flesh."

"When he regained consciousness, he started the process over. He stood, shuffled, fainted, stood, shuffled, found his clothes, fainted, stood, put on his trousers, fainted, put on his shirt, didn't faint, put on his waistcoat, didn't faint, put on his stockings, didn't faint, picked up his coat, fainted, stood, picked up his coat, fainted, stood,  and finally decided he could live without the coat. After much (but faintless) effort, he had on his shoes and cravat and was at last ready to leave the little tomb in which he'd be interred for so long."

What I'm reading next: Maisie Dobbs

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Top Ten Tuesday: Where Meagan Gets To Vent Again. This Time About Stupid Boys.



Yay! It's time for the weekly Top Ten Tuesday meme hosted by The Broke and The Bookish. The topic for this week is the Top Ten Jerks in Literature, so basically this is the second in a two-part series where I get to continue venting my real dislike for fictional characters who are fake in more ways than one. (See part one here.) Only this time, I get to go after then men. Excellent.

So here, in no particular order, I give you ten guys whom I'm just not that into:

1. Dex - Okay we're starting here for two reasons. First, I just saw Something Borrowed this weekend, so it's kind of top-of-mind, and second, because Dex represents the kind of jerk that I think often gets overlooked in lists like this. Why? Because he's a great guy. He's smart, good looking, sweet, and best of all, he's not afraid to tell you how he feels. Sounds perfect, right? Well, yes. Except for that teeny, tiny part about him stringing one girl along just because he's too afraid to leave the one he's with. Yes, Rachel is a better fit. Yes, she'll make him happy. Yes, he's loved her for "forever". But break off his wedding to Darcy? Absolutely not. I don't care if he's confused. He's still stupid. Haven't we all been that girl at one time or another? Manufacturing excuses to make it okay that we're being treated badly? Come on girls, it's gotta stop. Being a nice guy and a jerk is mutually exclusive, so let's all tell it like it is and keep our eyes peeled for jerks in nice guy clothing. *End rant*

2. Willoughby - Okay, so he represents what I like to call the Irish Twin of the Dexes of the literary world. They may be confused and stupid, but the Willoughbys of the world knowingly portray the good guy solely for their own gain. The whole world may think they're the greatest thing since sliced bread, but there's no confusion here. They aren't. Whether they're just bored or there are darker purposes at work, they just play the part until they're done playing the girl. Yes, maybe Willoughby really did fall for Marianne in the end, but he still took the easy way out by marrying the heiress. Who wins that one? Well yes, Marianne does end up with the better man, but Willoughby doesn't end up with too shabby a life either.

3. Captain Hook - Captain Hook? What's he doing here? Well, I'll tell you. Captain Hook represents a somewhat sanitized but nevertheless totally obvious type of jerk: the jerk who finds satisfaction in picking on people smaller than he is. I mean, fun and games aside, it's just not cool that Hook spends his time kidnapping little girls and trying to kill little boys.

4. Mr. Rochester - I know, I know. We love Mr. Rochester. But even he isn't immune to jerky behavior. Even after close to a dozen readings, the way he throws Blanche Ingram into Jane's face still makes me fume.

5. Markham V. Reynolds - I promise one day that all the same books won't show up on every Top Ten list I create, but I think one of the reasons these books come to mind so easily is because of the fantastic characters they contain. Even if they are fantastically jerky like Mr. Reynolds. Rich, dashing, impressed by a working woman's career (gasp), Reynolds is another guy that seems to paint a rosy picture. However, the truth is that beneath that sheen of acceptance and support is a man who thinks he owns the world. He doesn't really care about Juliet's work, or what she wants. His plans supersede everything and he has the gall to be genuinely surprised when Juliet refuses to go along with them. I personally find any man that has an expectation of complete subservience to be completely unpalatable; I don't care how divinely he dances.

6.  Snape - So yes, Harry Potter makes another appearance. But I'm mixing it up by not listing the more obvious choice of Draco. Snape makes a fascinating addition to this list as he is both mistakenly believed to be a jerk, and is also in fact a jerk. Snape gets a bad rap for his previous allegiance to Voldemort, so he's constantly accused of being behind whatever the latest mischief is, but even though he's not gunning for Harry's death, his jerky behavior toward him is genuine. He really kind of hates Harry, and lets it get to him. So despite being a wizard, Snape is actually quite human (:

7. Arthur Dimmesdale - Dimmesdale only goes to show that jerkiness knows no color, social status, or profession. Even a devout man of the cloth is not immune and Dimmesdale represents one of the lowest kind of jerks. The jerk who is aware he has acted badly, but lets his cowardice interfere with accepting punishment and making things right. Dimmesdale lets Hester suffer for years over something for which he was equally to blame. There's only one thing to say: Jerk.

8. All the men in Tess of the d'Urbervilles - Okay, okay, so maybe not all the men. But Tess definitely has to put up with her fair share. First there's her alcoholic father who somehow manages to put on airs despite his constant state of intoxication, then there's the obvious example of Alec, the stereotypical libertine and pursuer of his own pleasure. But the man who really gets my blood boiling is Angel Clare. Yes, yes, we're all know what's in a name and that a rose smells just as good when you call it a total jerk, but his name is Angel for crying out loud. Angel gets to know Tess, falls in love with her, and then faced with the inevitable discovery that nobody is perfect, throws her out into the cold, dark world. Alone. Oh, the hypocrisy, the stupid pride, the utter jerkiness of it all. Sure he comes to his senses eventually, but it doesn't do anybody one bit of good and that's a couple hours of the most depressing reading ever I'll never get back.

9. Dexter Mayhew - Dexter exemplifies the guy who has a heart of gold, but just can't seem to get it together. He's lucky Emma knows and loves him well enough to see past his hot mess. Actually, lucky is an understatement. The omniscient view the reader has into all of Dexter's actions reveals just how many chances he blew before finally making the best decision of his life. And though we cheer for his eventual success, we can't help but shake our heads at his jerky habits that led to many, many missed opportunities and unnecessary delays of his happiness. (I still think that unsent letter from India is one of the biggest literary tragedies ever :)

10. Iago - What can I say? I hate parrots. Or, more accurately, I hate jerky men who revel in ruining the lives of everyone around them for no other reason than petty envy AND I hate the obnoxious parrots that are named after them.

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Top Ten Tuesday: Mean Girls Meagan Wants To Punch In The Face


So this week's Top Ten Tuesday topic from The Broke and the Bookish = Best. Topic. Ever. I (Meagan) get to list the Top Ten Mean Girls I've come across in my reading and that I'd just love to punch in the face. Sweet!

Let me explain: I'm coming off a brutal two straight weeks on the road for work and have been averaging about 5 hours of sleep a night. What I'd really like is to be put a medically induced coma until I recover, but a good second-best option for relieving stress is griping about people I seriously dislike. And if these people are fictional, so much the better--then there's no need for guilt (:

You may recognize a few characters on this list from one of my previous posts but I'll try and come up with some new characters I love to hate.

1. Hattie - Okay, I'm going to go on a tangent right at the get-go and rant a little bit about the movie version of Ella Enchanted. I LOVED the book and was excited to see it translated to film. But when I went to see the film I was SO angry. I doubt a single person on that project actually read the book. If I had the money a remake of this movie would be high on the list of projects I'd tackle. ANYWAY, in Ella Enchanted the novel, Hattie is the oldest, ugliest, and evilest of Ella's two step sisters and her cruelty literally makes my skin crawl. If I could I'd punch her face AND steal her wig. 
2. Darcy Rhone - Something Borrowed was Emily Giffin's first and, in my opinion, best book and is also about to make its debut as a film. In the novel, Darcy is a perfect example of that privileged girl we love to hate. She's the lethal combination of a girl who thinks she's all that and actually does have it all. But she doesn't stop there, she has to have everyone else's all as well. Her selfishness and shallowness are impressive and I'd like nothing better than to knock her down a few pegs.
3. Sarah Reed - Is anyone else seeing a pattern here? Maybe books with truly awful characters are just as much of a draw as intriguing protagonists. Jane Eyre also made another appearance on the big screen with Sally Hawkins making a surprising appearance as this most awful of aunts. I still can't get over the fact that she called Jane to her deathbed just to make sure Jane realized just how much she was hated. What a piece of work!
4. Elizabeth Gilbert - Okay, so Elizabeth  represents more of a type that bothers me than how I feel about her character specifically. But whiny women who don't really have anything to whine about drive me crazy. Oh, I'm so rich I can afford to give up all my belongings and live abroad for years my life is so hard.  Oh, I'm so gorgeous than men everywhere fall at my feet but nobody can give me what I need. Oh, I'm all about asserting my independence but I'm not complete unless I have a man. Whine. Whine Whine. I may punch her, but only after duct-taping her obnoxious mouth shut (:
5. Scarlett O'Hara - I know, I know. She's an iconic character and everybody loves her. Everybody except me. I didn't like Scarlett from the beginning, but she became irredeemably unlikable when she stole her sister's beau, married him, and then wasn't even sorry when he was killed. I know many (if not most) of you disagree with me on this, but frankly, my dears.... (:
6. Ruth - I know I talk about Never Let Me Go but this is another list where it fits perfectly. Ruth's selfish actions in knowingly keeping Tommy and Kathy apart just so she wouldn't be alone are awful in themselves, but when you add that tragic circumstances of their doomed love and lives their separation seems almost too much to bear. None of the characters deserve their endings, but Ruth more than the others deserves some sort of punishment for her selfishness.
7. Hilly Holbrook - Hilly is a masterful representation of everything that was truly wrong with the South in the '60s. Brutal forces like the KKK were (and unfortunately still are) truly awful institutions but I believe a deeper insidiousness came from the attitudes of the women. Because it was from these women that children learned to judge and hate. Hilly is a small-minded, manipulative bigot who is dangerous because she is socially revered. I literally clapped my hands when I discovered the comeuppance she was handed for her unforgivable attitude.
8. Bella Swan - Sorry, but can't have a hater list without mentioning our favorite obnoxious, shallow, irrelevant heroine. 
9. Rebeckah Emerson - Familial betrayal is awful, but most especially in wartime. You may have your differences, but if your actions willfully cause harm to your family, then I have no sympathy at all for your welfare. During the Revolutionary War, Tory Rebeckah goes beyond believing she is right to personally attacking her sister Jemima, and deliberately tries to shame and guilt her. What a gem, right? Some Tories had viable reasons for their support of the British Crown, but she sure doesn't do anything for their image.
10. Dolores Umbridge - It seems like no list is complete without a reference to Harry Potter, and I think she represents the worst of the worst. Never mind you know who's desire to kill Harry, Dolores just wanted to hurt him. And she did it in the most sadistic way possible. Carving his skin with a pen? Really? Somehow I don't think a punch to the face would quite be enough...

Thursday, March 31, 2011

Literary Blog Hop: March 31-April 2

Welcome to the Literary Blog Hop hosted by The Blue Bookcase!

This blog hop is open to blogs that primarily feature book reviews of literary fiction, classic literature, and general literary discussion.

How do I know if my blog qualifies as "literary"? Literature has many definitions, but for our purposes your blog qualifies as "literary" if it focuses primarily on texts with aesthetic merit. In other words, texts that show quality not only in narrative but also in the effect of their language and structure. YA literature may fit into this category, but if your blog focuses primarily on non-literary YA, fantasy, romance, paranormal romance, or chick lit, you may prefer to join the blog hop at Crazy-for-books that is open to book blogs of all kinds.

Instructions for entering the Literary Blog Hop:

1. Grab the code for the Button.

Literary Blog Hop


2. Answer the following prompt on your blog.

(Suggestions for future prompts? Email to them us at thebluebookcase@gmail.com)

Do you find yourself predisposed to like (or dislike) books that are generally accepted as great books and have been incorporated into the literary canon? Discuss the affect you believe a book’s “status” has on your opinion of it.

Our answer comes from Meagan:

When I was maybe thirteen years old, the talk around the family dinner table one night turned to Africa. I've long since forgotten the specific details, but the outcome of the conversation was that my dad ran to Blockbuster and brought back a copy of "The Gods Must Be Crazy."

"You'll LOVE it!" he enthused.

"It's fantastic!" my mom chimed in.

So our entire family eagerly sat down to watch this supposed classic.

But for any of you that have seen the movie, the first ten minutes or so play like a really bad Animal Planet documentary. My siblings and I began to grow restless. What was this dated footage with the boring voice over? Was this our parents' sneaky way of getting us to do something "educational"? Had we been duped?

Our parents told us to be patient though, and eventually things took a turn for the better. By the time the credits were rolling we were all wiping away tears of laughter and making plans to watch the sequel as soon as possible.

-----

That experience describes how I feel about the so-called "great books" in the literary canon. I'm not really predisposed to like or dislike a classic because I've been exposed to enough good literature to know that each and every one of these books run the gamut of being treasured to despised. For example, as I think I've mentioned before, I kind of hated Gone With the Wind; but, I know it's one of Connie's absolute favorites and I don't think either of us are alone in our feelings and our opinions are divided by those of millions of other readers whose lukewarm feelings have them balancing somewhere in the more apathetic middle.

However, I usually put a lot of trust in the recommendations of people I respect. Just as my parents' promise of a fantastic film made me suspend my disbelief longer than I would have had I come across "The Gods Must Be Crazy" on my own, the fact that the books which are considered classics usually achieved that status because of the opinions of people who are or were widely respected makes me more likely to read further past the point where I would normally abandon a book not held in such esteem.

And nine times out of ten, popular opinion will be proven right. I loved the movie. I usually love the book. So when I hear of a book described as "great" or "classic", I generally reserve judgment until I've read it, but I'm more likely to give it a fair go in the process. And I usually expect a greater return for my efforts. If that movie had been an ounce less funny, I would have been a little incensed after such high praise. And if a classic fails to move me, I find it to be more guilty of offence than your average mediocre read.

How about you?


3. Add your link to the Linky List below.

Happy Hopping!

*PLEASE NOTE: if you do not answer the question and link back to The Blue Bookcase in a post on your blog, you will be removed from the Linky list. 




Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Top Ten Tuesday: Characters That Make Meagan's Family Look Like Saints

So this week's Top Ten Tuesday topic from The Broke and the Bookish is what characters I (Meagan) would like to have in my family. I think this is an awesome topic, but since I already answered a similar question about my fictional best friends and feel like there would be quite a big overlap on this topic, so I'm going to turn it on its head and instead write about characters that make my actual family members look like saints. (I love my family for the record, but we've definitely had our moments. Don't pretend you don't know what I'm talking about :) It's an odd, jumbled list mostly composed of what first came to mind, but then again, so are most of my lists :)

So, if you want to read about the original topic, click on that link up there. If you want an excuse to hug your family members, read on...

1. James Taggart - This one came immediately to mind because I'm rereading Atlas Shrugged right now (so look for that review in the next few weeks) and every time he opens his mouth I want to punch it closed again. I'm not usually so violent a person, but he makes me so mad and if I, like Dagny Taggart, had him as a brother, I would never be able to handle him with so much poise.
2. Bella Swan - Hate me all you want, but I. Cannot. Stand. Her. Being inside her head for a few hours was bad enough. Sharing a room with her through her entire angsty adolescence would have driven me mad. I don't think it's a coincidence that she's an only child.
3. Hattie - This evilest of all ugly stepsisters almost jumps off the page in all her bald, warty, bad-breathed glory. Reading about her in Ella Enchanted was one of the first times I remember crying a few tears of frustration and how truly unfair the treatment of a fictional character was. I shudder at the thought of such a sibling to this day.
4. Any female protagonist in Iris Johansen's books - So, yes, this is a broad list. And I should state that I actually really like first several books in the Eve Duncan series, but lately even she is beginning to get on my nerves. I've found most of Johansen's recent books to be astonishingly formulaic where the female acts stubborn, refuses to listen to common sense, makes things worse, then doesn't even apologize about all the work it takes everyone else to get her out of trouble. Never mind being an annoying sibling, I only hope I never have to be a mother to such a troublemaker. (Knock on wood.)
5. Aunt Louisa/Professor Morton - Eva Ibbotson's villains are on the whole decidedly mild, giving the reader a guilt-free opportunity to enthusiastically dislike them without expending energy on anger, but in A Company of Swans this duo of guardians poor Harriet Morton are truly evil. Vacillating between neglect and willful abuse, these two manage to crush Harriet's spirit and almost take her life and make me shudder over horrible aunts and fathers in general.
6. Sarah Reed - And speaking of horrible aunts, what a piece of work. Anyone who willfully hurts an already heavily abused niece as her last act on earth deserves a special place of honor you know where. How Jane Eyre manages to maintain her proud equilibrium is beyond me.
7. Darcy Rhone - I just saw the trailer for the movie version of Something Borrowed and it reminded me that Darcy is a perfect example of that privileged girl we love to hate. There are hundreds of books that have a Darcy. The girl who has everything, but finds it still isn't enough so she has to stick her claws into your stuff too and it's somehow your fault. Whether as a sister, a supposed best friend, or even a cousin you see on a blessedly infrequent basis, she's one piece of work I'm thankful isn't hanging on my wall.
8. Elizabeth Gilbert - Okay, confession: I had Eat, Pray, Love on my TBR pile, but I saw the movie on a flight back from England and immediately removed it. I couldn't stand her character in the movie, and after asking around, a found out the consensus of my reading friends whose opinions I trust was that she's just as obnoxious, only for hundreds of pages. I'm sure there are great themes of empowerment, and nobody is more interested in food or peace of mind than I am, but I found her sense of entitlement unacceptable and untenable in a family member.
9. Rebeckah Emerson - I've always love Ann Rinaldi's historical fiction, and I think she does an especially good job of portraying family relationships in Time Enough For Drums. Politics heats up the blood in our family and we are all fairly similar in our views, so I can't even imagine how hard it would be to be a family on the opposite sides of a war. But I think Rebeckah takes her differences of opinion a bit too far. She goes beyond believing she is right to personally attacking her sister Jemima, and deliberately tries to shame and guilt her. What a gem, right? Some Tories had viable reasons for their support of the British Crown, but she sure doesn't do anything for their image.
10. Dolores Umbridge - It seems like no list is complete without a reference to Harry Potter, and I think she represents the worst of the worst. Never mind you know who's desire to kill Harry, Dolores just wanted to hurt him. And she did it in the most sadistic way possible. Carving his skin with a pen? Really? I can't imagine what a horrific childhood she had that made her so awful; I'm just glad I didn't have to share it!