Showing posts sorted by relevance for query literary blog hop. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query literary blog hop. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, July 21, 2011

Literary Blog Hop: July 21-24

Welcome to the Literary Blog Hop hosted by The Blue Bookcase!

This blog hop is open to blogs that primarily feature book reviews of literary fiction, classic literature, and general literary discussion.

How do I know if my blog qualifies as "literary"? Literature has many definitions, but for our purposes your blog qualifies as "literary" if it focuses primarily on texts with aesthetic merit. In other words, texts that show quality not only in narrative but also in the effect of their language and structure. YA literature may fit into this category, but if your blog focuses primarily on non-literary YA, fantasy, romance, paranormal romance, or chick lit, you may prefer to join the blog hop at Crazy-for-books that is open to book blogs of all kinds.

Instructions for entering the Literary Blog Hop:

1. Grab the code for the Button.

Literary Blog Hop




2. Answer the following prompt on your blog.
(Suggestions for future prompts? Email to them us at thebluebookcase@gmail.com)

Discuss Bibliotherapy. Do you believe literature can be a viable form of therapy? Is literary writing more or less therapeutic than pop lit or nonfiction?

Our answer comes from Christina:

Reading has always made me feel better. But until this last week, when a friend pointed me toward the Bibliotherapy wikipedia article, I didn't know books were used purposefully in therapy. Since then, I've been thinking a lot about how the right book at the right time can make a difference in a person's life.

With that first question, my immediate instinct is to answer that yes, of course, literature is absolutely a viable form of therapy. As a depressed teenager, Reviving Ophelia and Prozac Nation improved my outlook on life more than I ever could have expected. Other girls and women had experienced what I was experiencing, and reading their stories helped me realize that I didn't have to feel alienated or embarrassed or ashamed about what I was going through. In a lot of ways, those books were my first steps toward healing. I can imagine that there are a lot of other situations where a book might provide that first improvement: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Anxiety surrounding major life changes, maybe some mood and personality disorders.

The therapeutic setting is one of only a handful of situations where I don't think Literature Proper really has much on Pop Lit and informational nonfiction. I mean, if you're a book snob (like so many of us here at the Literary Blog Hop) obviously good writing is going to speak to you more than poor writing. But taking a more general view of the literate population of the world, it's the message and the story that will make a difference to someone who is hurting, not necessarily the literary devices or style of prose. If I were a counseling psychologist would I only recommend Literature to my clients? Nope, I'd recommend whatever they were likely to read and appreciate.

Is literature really going to solve everyone's problems? Probably not. And is it the only or best solution in most cases? Probably not. Is it going to cure psychosis? No. And the last thing I want to suggest is that depressed people just need to read more good books. It took years of antidepressants and counseling before I really came out of the dark (to use one of many horrible clichés about depression) and every person's situation is different. But I love the idea of books as a part of therapy, and I wish I were better at recommending the right books to the friends who really need them. I wish I could change people's lives by recommending the right book. That's a beautiful thing.


3. Add your link to the Linky List below.Happy Hopping!
*PLEASE NOTE: if you do not answer the question and link back to The Blue Bookcase in a post on your blog, you will be removed from the Linky list.



Thursday, November 18, 2010

Literary Blog Hop: Nov 18-21

Welcome to this week's Literary Blog Hop hosted by The Blue Bookcase!

This blog hop is open to blogs that primarily feature book reviews of literary fiction, classic literature, and general literary discussion. If your blog does not fit this description, it may be removed from the Linky List. 

How do I know if my blog qualifies as "literary"? Literature has many definitions, but for our purposes your blog qualifies as "literary" if it focuses primarily on texts with aesthetic merit. In other words, texts that show quality not only in narrative but also in the effect of their language and structure. YA literature may fit into this category, but if your blog focuses primarily on non-literary YA, fantasy, romance, paranormal romance, or chick lit, you may prefer to join the blog hop at Crazy-for-books that is open to book blogs of all genres.

Instructions for entering the Literary Blog Hop:


1. Grab the code for the Button.



Literary Blog Hop
2. Answer the following prompt on your blog:


This week's question is:
Is there such a thing as literary non-fiction? If so, how do you define it? Examples?

(Suggestions for future prompts? Email them to us at thebluebookcase@gmail.com)


Our answer this week comes from Connie:


To this question, I reply with a resounding YES! Though much of the non-fiction book pool is self-help, how-to, text books, histories, formulaic biographies, recipe books, etc., I firmly believe in the literary merits of certain non-fiction works. 


Now for definitions. For the record, I HATE defining things, but I may as well take a crack at it. I would define literary non-fiction as works that present actual people and events in such a way that particular aesthetic emphasis is placed on the form, prose, themes, and characterization contained in it; in other words, it exists not merely to inform but to be beautiful; it educates not only in facts, but also in some aspect of the human condition.


Literary non-fiction comes in many different forms -- personal essays, memoir, autobiography, biography, even history and critical essay, such as Virginia Woolf's A Room of One's Own. However, I can't think of anyone who has mastered the art of literary non-fiction better than Maya Angelou. Not only did she invent the "serial autobiography," but she has also mastered the form of the personal essay, not to even mention her poetry. I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings (read my review hereis the famous first book in her six-part autobiography, and without hesitation I would deem it literary. I hardly need mention her famous and inimitable aesthetic style. Moreover, she doesn't tell her somewhat tragic tale to gain sympathy or evoke a strong emotional response -- she writes it to examine her life and, in turn, life as a whole, dealing with the psychological effects of rape, Southern prejudice, and the empowering effect of knowledge. She also examines in great detail the intense and complicated familial relationships between her and her brother, her and her grandmother, her and her parents, and her brother and their parents. Needless to say, this is anything but a single-dimensional reading.


Now it's your turn -- do you believe in literary non-fiction? How would YOU define it? Examples? Happy hopping!





Thursday, March 3, 2011

Literary Blog Hop: March 3-6

Welcome to the Literary Blog Hop hosted by The Blue Bookcase!

This blog hop is open to blogs that primarily feature book reviews of literary fiction, classic literature, and general literary discussion.

How do I know if my blog qualifies as "literary"? Literature has many definitions, but for our purposes your blog qualifies as "literary" if it focuses primarily on texts with aesthetic merit. In other words, texts that show quality not only in narrative but also in the effect of their language and structure. YA literature may fit into this category, but if your blog focuses primarily on non-literary YA, fantasy, romance, paranormal romance, or chick lit, you may prefer to join the blog hop at Crazy-for-books that is open to book blogs of all kinds.

Instructions for entering the Literary Blog Hop:

1. Grab the code for the Button.

Literary Blog Hop


2. Answer the following prompt on your blog.

(Suggestions for future prompts? Email to them us at thebluebookcase@gmail.com)

Gilion from Rose City Reader asks:

Can literature be funny? What is your favorite humorous literary book?

Our answer this week comes from Lucia:

I will make the assumption that classics qualify as 'literary,' (although if you object I'd be interested to hear your argument, so please don't hesitate). I see a text as being of literary merit when there is heavy focus towards the way in which the author displays his or her ideas, through the use of language, style and structure. That being said, a dull plot remains a dull plot no matter how articulately or originally written. Should an author develop humour into their language or write in a style which is witty, sarcastic, charming, funny etc, in addition to these 'literary' qualities, logic would say that a kind of humorous literature is created. I believe that humour, in any form, can be introduced into a novel which is either literary or not. It is an addition, and not an essential quality of either. So, after all that babbling, yes, would be my answer of absolute certainty that literature can be and is, funny.

My favorite humorous literary book would be Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen. I think it is widely acknowledged that she has literary merit, and for me, that which makes her work so is in her descriptions of society and its values at the time. Austen's wit is often evident only after one has read a particular line several times (at least, that's what I find myself doing), and wondering 'why have I been drawn to this phrase more than once?' What I mean is, it's not an overt kind of language feature. Her style is sarcastic and witty, yet subtle and undistracting, which is what I love best about Austen.

3. Add your link to the Linky List below.

Happy Hopping!

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Literary Blog Hop: March 17-20

Welcome to the Literary Blog Hop hosted by The Blue Bookcase!

This blog hop is open to blogs that primarily feature book reviews of literary fiction, classic literature, and general literary discussion.

How do I know if my blog qualifies as "literary"? Literature has many definitions, but for our purposes your blog qualifies as "literary" if it focuses primarily on texts with aesthetic merit. In other words, texts that show quality not only in narrative but also in the effect of their language and structure. YA literature may fit into this category, but if your blog focuses primarily on non-literary YA, fantasy, romance, paranormal romance, or chick lit, you may prefer to join the blog hop at Crazy-for-books that is open to book blogs of all kinds.

Instructions for entering the Literary Blog Hop:

1. Grab the code for the Button.

Literary Blog Hop


2. Answer the following prompt on your blog.

(Suggestions for future prompts? Email to them us at thebluebookcase@gmail.com)

Debbie Nance from ReaderBuzz asks:

What one literary work must you read before you die?

Our answer this week comes from Christina:

The wording of this prompt can be interpreted two ways. And, being the chatty little blogger that I am, I'm going to answer both interpretations!

1.) The literary work that I recommend you (yes, you) must read before you die:
Well, I usually try to tailor my recommendations to the recommendee a little. But, if pressed, I think I'll go with Middlesex, by Jeffrey Eugenides. I know not everyone likes this book, but I loved it intensely. I never wanted it to end, and I think it has something for everyone.

2.) The literary work that I must read before I die:
With this question, the first things I think of are the big works, like War and Peace, Infinite Jest, The Complete Works of William Shakespeare. And I do really want to read all of those. But to be honest, the book I feel the strongest draw toward right now is The Complete Stories of Flannery O'Connor. If I were to die tonight (knock on wood), one of my last thoughts might be, "Oh, MAN! I never got to read all of Flannery O'Connor's stories!" And the really sad thing would be that I've had the book sitting on my shelf for, like, three years.

I'm looking forward to seeing how you all interpret and answer this question! Hop away!

3. Add your link to the Linky List below.

Happy Hopping!

*PLEASE NOTE: if you do not answer the question and link back to The Blue Bookcase in a post on your blog, you will be removed from the Linky list. 



Friday, November 5, 2010

Literary Blog Hop: Nov 5-8

Welcome to this week's Literary Blog Hop hosted by The Blue Bookcase!

This blog hop is open to blogs that primarily feature book reviews of literary fiction, classic literature, and general literary discussion.

How do I know if my blog qualifies as "literary"? Literature has many definitions, but for our purposes your blog qualifies as "literary" if it focuses primarily on texts with aesthetic merit. In other words, texts that show quality not only in narrative but also in the effect of their language and structure. YA literature may fit into this category, but if your blog focuses primarily on non-literary YA, fantasy, romance, paranormal romance, or chick lit, you may prefer to join the blog hop at Crazy-for-books that is open to book blogs of all genres.

Instructions for entering the Literary Blog Hop:



1. Grab the code for the Button.





Literary Blog Hop




2. Answer the following prompt on your blog: 


Please highlight one of your favorite books and why you would consider it "literary."



Our answer this week comes from Christina:

Is there a hard and fast definition of Literary Fiction?  For me, it’s more of an “I know it when I see it” categorization.  When pressed, I’ll point to all those terms we studied in our high school English courses:  symbolism, imagery, themes, metaphor, irony.  Most classics have a pretty nice spread of literary devices.  Let’s take a look at a modern classic, a novel I respect immensely: Revolutionary Road.

Written in 1961 by Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road is the story of April and Frank Wheeler, a couple who struggle with marital strife and identity issues in 1950’s-era American Suburbia.  Yates writes the complexities of human relationships poignantly, artfully and always accessibly.  His unsentimental presentation of the characters’ intense emotions and conflicts rings so true as to be uncomfortable to read.  To be honest, when I read this book a year ago I was pretty shaken by it.  Frank and April are dynamic, tragic and nuanced characters and because I identified with them so closely, Revolutionary Road hit a little too close to home. 

That brings me to one of the reasons I consider this novel “literary”: continuing social relevance.  Important novels are socially relevant not only to the period in which they are written and/or take place, but for many years afterward.  Nearly 50 years after publication, Revolutionary Road’s characters, their angst, and the underlying themes still feel current.  At the same time, its setting is specific enough for it to effectively be classified as a period piece.  That’s good writing. 

Maybe it’s an elitist cop-out, but I also associate Literary Fiction closely with awards and reviews. Revolutionary Road was a National Book Award finalist and was listed among Time’s 100 best English-language novels from 1923-2005.  It received praise from Kurt Vonnegut, Tennessee Williams, and most literary critics.

Want a taste?  Here you go:

"The Revolutionary Hill Estates had not been designed to accommodate a tragedy.  Even at night, as if on purpose, the development held no looming shadows and no gaunt silhouettes.  It was invincibly cheerful, a toyland of white and pastel houses whose bright, uncurtained windows winked blandly through a dappling of green and yellow leaves. . . . A man running down these streets in desperate grief was indecently out of place.  Except for the whisk of his shoes on the asphalt and the rush of his own breath, it was so quiet that he could hear the sounds of television in the dozing rooms behind the leaves - a blurred comedian's shout followed by dim, spastic waves of laughter and applause, and then the striking-up of a band."

[In a related story, Connie started a discussion about our perception of the literary cannon here.  What do you think?]



3. Put your link and the name of your blog in the Mr. Linky below. 

4. Visit the blogs in the list and leave a comment. Thanks for participating!

Thursday, July 7, 2011

Literary Blog Hop: July 7-10

Welcome to the Literary Blog Hop hosted by The Blue Bookcase!

This blog hop is open to blogs that primarily feature book reviews of literary fiction, classic literature, and general literary discussion.

How do I know if my blog qualifies as "literary"? Literature has many definitions, but for our purposes your blog qualifies as "literary" if it focuses primarily on texts with aesthetic merit. In other words, texts that show quality not only in narrative but also in the effect of their language and structure. YA literature may fit into this category, but if your blog focuses primarily on non-literary YA, fantasy, romance, paranormal romance, or chick lit, you may prefer to join the blog hop at Crazy-for-books that is open to book blogs of all kinds.

Instructions for entering the Literary Blog Hop:

1. Grab the code for the Button.

Literary Blog Hop




2. Answer the following prompt on your blog.
(Suggestions for future prompts? Email to them us at thebluebookcase@gmail.com)

What is one of your favorite literary devices? Why do you like it? Provide a definition and an awesome example.

Our answer comes from Ingrid:

I love the word palimpsest. According to my trusty Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory, the word "palimpsest" comes from the Greek word meaning "again rubbed away." It refers to "a surface, usually vellum or parchment, which has been used more than once for writing on, the previous writing having been rubbed out or somehow removed. Medieval parchment, being expensive, was often used two or three times."

The first time I came upon this term was in one of my first French Literature classes ... but I can't for the life of me remember in what context this term came up. I think the teacher was explaining to us the writing of a certain French author, but I can't remember who. To tell you the truth, I was pretty lost in that class ... I probably understood about a third of what the teacher was saying.

The second time I came upon this term was in an English class I took my very last semester. We were discussing the poetry of Natasha Tretheway and her collection of poems called "Native Guard." Tretheway has explained in interviews that her intent was, in her own personal way, to rewrite history. She imagined a journal with the words crossed out and her own words written over the top. Much of this collection was focused on her relationship with her mother and events that ocurred in her mother's life. Though I didn't love the collection as a whole, I loved how Tretheway used this concept of palimpsest to tie multiple narratives and points of view together.

What about you? What is one of your favorite literary concepts or devices? How did you learn about it? Why do you like it?

3. Add your link to the Linky List below.Happy Hopping! 
 *PLEASE NOTE: if you do not answer the question and link back to The Blue Bookcase in a post on your blog, you will be removed from the Linky list.



Thursday, November 3, 2011

Literary Blog Hop: November 3-6

Welcome to the Literary Blog Hop hosted by The Blue Bookcase!

This monthly blog hop is open to blogs that primarily feature book reviews of literary fiction, classic literature, and general literary discussion.

How do I know if my blog qualifies as "literary"? Literature has many definitions, but for our purposes your blog qualifies as "literary" if it focuses primarily on texts with aesthetic merit. In other words, texts that show quality not only in narrative but also in the effect of their language and structure. YA literature may fit into this category, but if your blog focuses primarily on non-literary YA, fantasy, romance, paranormal romance, or chick lit, you may prefer to join the blog hop at Crazy-for-books that is open to book blogs of all kinds.

Instructions for entering the Literary Blog Hop:

1. Grab the code for the Button.

Literary Blog Hop




2. Answer the following prompt on your blog.
(Suggestions for future prompts? Email to them us at thebluebookcase@gmail.com)

Here's our question this week:

To what extent do you analyze literature? Are you more analytical in your reading if you know you're going to review the book? Is analysis useful in helping you understand and appreciate literature, or does it detract from your readerly experience?

Our answer comes from Christina:

Okay. So. A few weeks ago I listened to this interview with Jeffrey Eugenides in which he discusses his new book, The Marriage Plot. I could write a post and a half just about this interview because I adore Mr. Eugenides, but for our purposes one topic he mentions is especially relevant: Semiotics. I had never heard this term before, but the way he explains it makes it sound like it's the process of deconstructing all literature to the point where every word becomes a meaningless cliché. I am really happy that I never learned Semiotics; I feel certain that it would take all the joy and empathy out of reading. (OR maybe I'm totally misunderstanding this whole business. I kinda hope so. Please enlighten me.)

So anyway, that part of the interview got me thinking about literary analysis and literary theory, especially as they pertain to book blogging. Hence this LBH prompt!

I don't have a strong English Literature background; I didn't have any lit classes in college. Everything I know about analysis comes from my 12th-grade English teacher, Mrs. Riley. Remember those analytical essays we all (or many of us) wrote in preparation for the AP English exam? Good times. Of course I thought those essays were nonsense at the time, but I really am indebted to Mrs. Riley for teaching me to read carefully and critically. She taught me to keep a pen and paper handy and to keep my mind switched on rather than letting the story wash over me. I love reading this way now, and it's the only way I know how to prepare for a review. I definitely read more carefully and critically when I know I'm going to be writing about a book. Maybe this is why nonliterary fiction tends to be so disappointing. I have trouble turning off that critical part of my brain, and so I get frustrated with the wasted effort I put into searching for literary devices in an empty story.

But then, how does one apply literary analysis to nonfiction? I have no idea. I think that's why I like a good bit of nonfic from time to time. I can just open up my mind and let the ideas in, and I think I read more quickly- I'm not looking for things in the text. It's freeing.

Can't wait to hear all y'all's ideas on this topic! Thanks for hopping!

3. Add your link to the Linky List below.Happy Hopping!
*PLEASE NOTE: if you do not answer the question and link back to The Blue Bookcase in a post on your blog, you will be removed from the Linky list.

Thursday, November 11, 2010

Literary Blog Hop: Nov 11-14

Welcome to this week's Literary Blog Hop hosted by The Blue Bookcase!

This blog hop is open to blogs that primarily feature book reviews of literary fiction, classic literature, and general literary discussion. If your blog does not fit this description, it may be removed from the Linky List. 

How do I know if my blog qualifies as "literary"? Literature has many definitions, but for our purposes your blog qualifies as "literary" if it focuses primarily on texts with aesthetic merit. In other words, texts that show quality not only in narrative but also in the effect of their language and structure. YA literature may fit into this category, but if your blog focuses primarily on non-literary YA, fantasy, romance, paranormal romance, or chick lit, you may prefer to join the blog hop at Crazy-for-books that is open to book blogs of all genres.

Instructions for entering the Literary Blog Hop:


1. Grab the code for the Button.


Literary Blog Hop
2. Answer the following prompt on your blog:


This week's question comes from Debbie Nance at Readerbuzz
What is the most difficult literary work you've ever read? What made it so difficult?

(Suggestions for future prompts? Email them to us at thebluebookcase@gmail.com)


Our answer this week comes from Ingrid:

The most difficult literary work I've ever read was probably Doctor Faustus by Thomas Mann. The reason that this book was so difficult is primarily because it has five "themes" going on at once. The first is the surface story, which is about a German composer named Adrian Leverkühn who contracts syphilus on purpose in order to fuel his creativity and write his greatest piece of music. This story parallels the traditional German Faust legend, with Adrian as the Faust figure, as he makes a sort of "pact" with the devil in that he gives himself over to the disease to be able to become a better composer. Adrian's story also runs parallel to the life of the notoriously anti-Christian philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche down to the smallest details. The story also contains important references to music theory, mentioning certain notes at key points in the story that all work together to create a resonant "chord." Lastly, this novel also acts as a metaphor commenting on the politics in Germany leading up to World War Two, essentially suggesting that Germany is also making a pact with a "devil." Besides the surface narrative itself, these other themes are veiled and not mentioned directly. Readers would miss out on this novel's incredible amplitude and depth of its message without recognizing the allusions and understanding the significant relationship between traditional German folklore, Friedrich Nietzsche, music theory, and pre-World War Two Germany. Luckily, I read this book in a class was able to study it in depth ... otherwise I certainly would not have appreciated the absolute genius that is Thomas Mann. This book also contains the most powerful and resonant last line I have probably ever read. So there you go, the most difficult literary work I have ever read!

3. Put your link and the name of your blog in the Mr. Linky below. 

4. Visit the blogs in the list and leave a comment. Thanks for participating!

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Literary Blog Hop: Nov 25-28

Welcome to this week's Literary Blog Hop hosted by The Blue Bookcase!

This blog hop is open to blogs that primarily feature book reviews of literary fiction, classic literature, and general literary discussion. If your blog does not fit this description, it may be removed from the Linky List. 

How do I know if my blog qualifies as "literary"? Literature has many definitions, but for our purposes your blog qualifies as "literary" if it focuses primarily on texts with aesthetic merit. In other words, texts that show quality not only in narrative but also in the effect of their language and structure. YA literature may fit into this category, but if your blog focuses primarily on non-literary YA, fantasy, romance, paranormal romance, or chick lit, you may prefer to join the blog hop at Crazy-for-books that is open to book blogs of all genres.

Instructions for entering the Literary Blog Hop:


1. Grab the code for the Button.



Literary Blog Hop
2. Answer the following prompt on your blog:


This week's question is:

What makes a contemporary novel a classic? 
Discuss a book which you think fits the category of ‘modern classics’ and explain why. 

(Suggestions for future prompts? Email them to us at thebluebookcase@gmail.com)


Our answer this week comes from Meagan:



Wow, talk about a loaded question! Okay, so can we all agree that (for the most part) classic = literary? I know we have future plans to debate this point in another Literary Blog Hop, but for the sake of argument (and in my opinion) the equation is sound. We here at the Blue Bookcase define as literary: 'texts that show quality not only in narrative but also in the effect of their language and structure', and if classic = literary, then the definition stands for both terms. Except, personally, I would add to that definition of classic that the text must reflect some aspect of the society and culture in which it was written while simultaneously transcending that society and culture. For instance, I'd call pretty much anything Dickens wrote 'classic'. His novels are well written and smartly constructed (asthetic appeal: check), and they reflect innumerable facets of Victorian life in England from vivid descriptions of geography to detailed portraits of people of every class (cultural reflection: check). But most important, those aspects which so perfectly capture life in England at the turn of the nineteenth century are equally as relevant today; themes of justice, mercy, greed, philanthropy, etc., etc., find just as much resonance with a 21st century audience (transcendence: check). (Raise your hand if at least one reference to  A Christmas Carol doesn't aptly find it's way into your holiday celebrations every year. Anyone? Anyone? Yes, that's what I thought.)
With that in mind, I personally find it hard to describe what makes a contemporary novel a classic. In fact, I would venture to say that it cannot be done. Note: I'm not saying that nothing written today will be worthy of the definition of 'classic', but I just think it's not really up to us to make that call. I've heard the argument that a novel written today which, according to our definition clearly has literary merit, has 'changed the lives of thousands of readers' and that must make it a classic (and indeed, the popularity of Dickens during his lifetime backs up that assertion), but that's not good enough. I majored in English as an undergrad and if I had a nickel for every footnote in an assigned reading which discussed a passing reference as a quote from or allusion to such and such work which was 'extremely popular at the time' but which I'd never heard of, well, let's just say buying a private plane wouldn't have been much of a stretch. There are plenty of novels generally considered to be 'classics' today which were doomed to indifferent anonymity for decades if not centuries after their publication. Or even more common, enjoyed periods of great success and were then lost to remembrance.
So, the short version: I don't think a contemporary novel can be defined as classic until enough time as past for readers to measure the level of their transcendence beyond the moment of their creation.
That being said, using those same parameters, I think it may be possible to identify contemporary novels that have the potential to become classics. If I had to predict a future classic, I'd have to go back to my Old Reliable Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro. Ishiguro's writing style is brilliant and his characterizations are devastatingly realistic (asthetic appeal: check) and the novel deals with cloning, what it means to be human, and various definitions of love in modern society (cultural reflection: check). As for the final point, I believe that as we press forward with issues such as stem cell research, healthcare, and the study of human relationships, the novel will continue to have a relevancy far beyond its publication date. So, transcendence: check? Only time will tell...
What is your stance on the idea of contemporary classics? What novels do you think fit the bill now, or, if you think like me, may at some future date?




3. Add your link to the Linky List below. 


Happy hopping!

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Literary Blog Hop: Sep 8-11

Welcome to the Literary Blog Hop hosted by The Blue Bookcase!

This monthly blog hop is open to blogs that primarily feature book reviews of literary fiction, classic literature, and general literary discussion.

How do I know if my blog qualifies as "literary"? Literature has many definitions, but for our purposes your blog qualifies as "literary" if it focuses primarily on texts with aesthetic merit. In other words, texts that show quality not only in narrative but also in the effect of their language and structure. YA literature may fit into this category, but if your blog focuses primarily on non-literary YA, fantasy, romance, paranormal romance, or chick lit, you may prefer to join the blog hop at Crazy-for-books that is open to book blogs of all kinds.

Instructions for entering the Literary Blog Hop:

1. Grab the code for the Button.

Literary Blog Hop




2. Answer the following prompt on your blog.
(Suggestions for future prompts? Email to them us at thebluebookcase@gmail.com)

Must all literary writing be difficult? Can you think of examples of literary writing that were not difficult?

Our answer comes from Lucia:

I think the response to this question really depends on how the word 'difficult' is interpreted. Assuming it refers to the language itself which is difficult, then I think its degree of difficulty is to be determined by the individual reader. In this respect, the first time I read anything by Jane Austen, it took me 3 months because I was so unused to the style of writing. Although now (6 years on) I find Austen's language fairly easy to read, I still struggle with some classics. A Christmas Carol was gruelling, as was Mrs Dalloway. However, I find the writing styles of authors such as Arthur Conan Doyle very straight forward to read, as well as many contemporary authors of literary fiction. The pace of a novel, for me, also affects the how difficult it is to read.

On the other hand, if the word 'difficult' refers to the subject matter or content of the novel which is challenging or confronting, I think the answer to the question is a little more objective. I think an author who deals with an issue skillfully and thoughtfully so as to engage the reader and put forth their point of view, may be easier to read as opposed to an author whose handling of a subject is tacky and superficial. That being said I don't mean to suggest that Dickens or Woolf are either of these things, as the difficulty of their writing for me lies solely in the language. Examples of works I believe are not difficult to read for these reasons include Speak by Laurie Halse Anderson, To Kill A Mocking Bird by Harper Lee and The Bean Trees by Barbara Kingsolver.

3. Add your link to the Linky List below.Happy Hopping!
*PLEASE NOTE: if you do not answer the question and link back to The Blue Bookcase in a post on your blog, you will be removed from the Linky list.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Literary Blog Hop: May 12-15

Welcome to the Literary Blog Hop hosted by The Blue Bookcase!

This blog hop is open to blogs that primarily feature book reviews of literary fiction, classic literature, and general literary discussion.

How do I know if my blog qualifies as "literary"? Literature has many definitions, but for our purposes your blog qualifies as "literary" if it focuses primarily on texts with aesthetic merit. In other words, texts that show quality not only in narrative but also in the effect of their language and structure. YA literature may fit into this category, but if your blog focuses primarily on non-literary YA, fantasy, romance, paranormal romance, or chick lit, you may prefer to join the blog hop at Crazy-for-books that is open to book blogs of all kinds.

Instructions for entering the Literary Blog Hop:

1. Grab the code for the Button.

Literary Blog Hop


2. Answer the following prompt on your blog.

(Suggestions for future prompts? Email to them us at thebluebookcase@gmail.com)

What books have you read that have been hyped as literary and, in your opinion, were not?

Our answer comes from Lucia:

Lovesong by Alex Miller

I heard amazing reviews praising both the book and it's Australian author. It won/ was shortlisted for a handful of literary prizes. However did I not like the story's plot, and was bored by the author's style and descriptions. Before I go further I will say that this is just one girl's opinion and that others may have perfectly legitimate reasons why this book is literary. Miller's language is simple in a way that I did not find captivating or reflective of the proposed mood of the text. The primary theme which I obtained from Lovesong was how even very ordinary lives can be both beautiful and ripe with aching sadness. I felt that the descriptions were meant to be intimate portrayals of the characters and their circumstances, although I did not understand how the use of language showed this. It just seemed flat and at times even teetered on being poorly written. For the most part, I found the characters to be the strongest element of the novel. The narrating character Ken, an aging writer searching for a last story, however, was highly disagreeable. In his constant niggling at obtaining the full story of another couple's relationship, Miller creates the impression that the character is somewhat unsympathetic or indifferent to his friend's evident despair. Furthermore, the details of Ken's past and the death of his wife propose to create an understanding and deeply empathetic character, yet to me he did not display either of these qualities. Miller sets the scene for Ken to be able to sympathize with John, and yet this does not occur.

3. Add your link to the Linky List below.

Happy Hopping!

*PLEASE NOTE: if you do not answer the question and link back to The Blue Bookcase in a post on your blog, you will be removed from the Linky list. 





Thursday, February 9, 2012

Literary Blog Hop: February 9-12

Welcome to the Literary Blog Hop hosted by The Blue Bookcase!

This monthly blog hop is open to blogs that primarily feature book reviews of literary fiction, classic literature, and general literary discussion.

How do I know if my blog qualifies as "literary"? Literature has many definitions, but for our purposes your blog qualifies as "literary" if it focuses primarily on texts with aesthetic merit. In other words, texts that show quality not only in narrative but also in the effect of their language and structure. YA literature may fit into this category, but if your blog focuses primarily on non-literary YA, fantasy, romance, paranormal romance, or chick lit, you may prefer to join the blog hop at Crazy-for-books that is open to book blogs of all kinds.

Instructions for entering the Literary Blog Hop:

1. Grab the code for the Button.

Literary Blog Hop




2. Answer the following prompt on your blog.
(Suggestions for future prompts? Email to them us at thebluebookcase@gmail.com)

Here's our question this week:

In the epilogue for Fargo Rock City, Chuck Klosterman writes:

Our answer comes from Christina:

When I write a review, I almost always stress out about my overuse of the word "I." I worry that my posts are really more personal responses than intellectual reviews, and that my self-absorption comes through more clearly than the points I'm trying to make about the book. So when I read that quotation from Mr. Klosterman a few days ago, it really stuck out in my mind and made me think.

That same day Ingrid posted Why I Review, a discussion of the purpose of book blog reviewing. There are a bunch of smart comments on that post. One of them is from Ben: "Distance is critical. In reading, in intellectual matters and even if physical work, like boxing for example. Establishing proper distance is vital to not get punched in the face."

What's the ideal balance between autobiography and distance in an informal review? Obviously with academic writing distance is far more important than personal connection. But when I'm reading a blog post, I do like to learn a little about the reviewer while I'm also learning about the book and author. Then again, extremely emotional responses don't usually make great reviews. I don't really have an answer to this prompt, which is why I was so eager to post it. How do you find balance in your own review writing? What kind of autobiography-to-distance ratio do you prefer when you're reading a blog?

3. Add your link to the Linky List below.

Happy Hopping!
*PLEASE NOTE: if you do not answer the question and link back to The Blue Bookcase in a post on your blog, you will be removed from the Linky list.
"It's always been my theory that criticism is really just veiled autobiography; whenever someone writes about a piece of art, they're really just writing about themselves."
Do you agree?

Thursday, December 9, 2010

Literary Blog Hop: Dec 9-12

Welcome to this week's Literary Blog Hop hosted by The Blue Bookcase!

This blog hop is open to blogs that primarily feature 
book reviews of literary fictionclassic literature, and general literary discussion


How do I know if my blog qualifies as "literary"? Literature has many definitions, but for our purposes your blog qualifies as "literary" if it focuses primarily on texts with aesthetic merit. In other words, texts that show quality not only in narrative but also in the effect of their language and structure. YA literature may fit into this category, but if your blog focuses primarily on non-literary YA, fantasy, romance, paranormal romance, or chick lit, you may prefer to join the blog hop at Crazy-for-books that is open to book blogs of all kinds.


Instructions for entering the Literary Blog Hop:



1. Grab the code for the Button.





Literary Blog Hop




2. Answer the following prompt on your blog:


(Suggestions for future prompts? Email them to us at thebluebookcase@gmail.com)


What is one of your literary pet peeves?  Is there something that writers do that really sets your teeth on edge?  Be specific, and give examples if you can.

Our answer this week comes from
Christina:


I have lots of readerly pet peeves.  Any kind of punctuation or grammatical error is almost always an automatic deal-breaker, but I'm pretty sure everyone within the Literary Blogging world will agree with me there.  So I feel like I need to come up with something a little more original.  Luckily, Mr. Dave Eggers has recently reminded me of one thing writers do that I HATE.  See if you can spot it:





Yeah.  Dialogue that goes on for more than a page without a single "he said" or "she said."  I inevitably lose track of who is saying what, and then I'm just muddling through, waiting for the author to throw me a frickin' bone, some kind of hint, so that I can get back on track.  Often I'll read the entire excerpt several times, trying to picture the conversation correctly.  Sometimes I get so confused that I actually wonder if the author himself forgot which character was which. 

Is anyone else bothered by this? Plenty of good, literary writers do it!  It drives me berserk!

(P.S. - The above photo is from A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius.  My review of it will be up Friday.)



3. Add your link to the Linky List below.





Happy Hopping!

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Literary Blog Hop: Feb 17-20

Welcome to this week's Literary Blog Hop hosted by The Blue Bookcase!

This blog hop is open to blogs that primarily feature book reviews of literary fiction, classic literature, and general literary discussion.

How do I know if my blog qualifies as "literary"? Literature has many definitions, but for our purposes your blog qualifies as "literary" if it focuses primarily on texts with aesthetic merit. In other words, texts that show quality not only in narrative but also in the effect of their language and structure. YA literature may fit into this category, but if your blog focuses primarily on non-literary YA, fantasy, romance, paranormal romance, or chick lit, you may prefer to join the blog hop at Crazy-for-books that is open to book blogs of all kinds.

Instructions for entering the Literary Blog Hop:

1. Grab the code for the Button.

Literary Blog Hop


2. Answer the following prompt on your blog.

(Suggestions for future prompts? Email to them us at thebluebookcase@gmail.com)

Mel u from The Reading Life says:

Not long ago I read and posted on The Harp of Burma by Michio Takeyama, 1966. It is one of the very best novels about WWII, written from the point of view of a Japanese Buddhist who was drafted as a combat soldier. He had no idea how long he would be gone or if he would really ever return. He had room in his backpack for one book, so he took The Red and the Black by Stendhal. He carried it through the jungles of South Asia for 4 years. He said it helped keep him sane in the face of all the horrors he saw. This made me wonder what work of literary fiction I would take with me under similar circumstances."

If you were going off to war (or some other similarly horrific situation) and could only take one book with you, which literary book would you take and why?

Our answer this week comes from Ingrid:

If I were to only have one book to get me through tough times, it would definitely be War and Peace. (Remember my post on it? Just had to put that in here.) Tolstoy's characters are so endearing to me ... Pierre, Andrei, Natasha, Nikolai, Andrei's crazy dad ... I love them all. Each of these characters have to face incredibly tough situations, and I love seeing how they evolve because of it. Because really, life is hard and horrible things happen to everyone. I love the way Tolstoy explores disenchantment and all the contingencies of life. Hands down War and Peace will always be the book I go through to get me through difficult times.

3. Add your link to the Linky List below.

Happy Hopping!


Thursday, December 23, 2010

Literary Blog Hop: Dec 23-26


Welcome to this week's Literary Blog Hop hosted by The Blue Bookcase!

This blog hop is open to blogs that primarily feature 
book reviews of literary fictionclassic literature, and general literary discussion

How do I know if my blog qualifies as "literary"? Literature has many definitions, but for our purposes your blog qualifies as "literary" if it focuses primarily on texts with aesthetic merit. In other words, texts that show quality not only in narrative but also in the effect of their language and structure. YA literature may fit into this category, but if your blog focuses primarily on non-literary YA, fantasy, romance, paranormal romance, or chick lit, you may prefer to join the blog hop at Crazy-for-books that is open to book blogs of all kinds.

Instructions for entering the Literary Blog Hop:

1. Grab the code for the Button.

Literary Blog Hop


2. Answer the following prompt on your blog:

(Suggestions for future prompts? Email them to us at thebluebookcase@gmail.com)

This week's question comes from Lisa at bibliophiliac:


What literary title (fiction or non-fiction) do you love that has been under-appreciated?  We all know about the latest Dan Brown, and James Patterson isn't hurting for publicity.  What quiet masterpiece do you want more readers to know?


... and our answer this week comes from Ingrid:


One of my favorite books is Solar Storms by Lisa Hogan. This book is about Angel, a rebellious teenager who was abused as a baby and grew up in foster homes. Wanting to connect with her relatives in some way, she travels to the remote region of Canada where she was born. She finds her grandmother, her great-grandmother, and her great-great grandmother. She learns secrets of her family and the special connection she has with her foremothers. Together, they go on a canoe journey to their ancestral homeland in the far north to fight the building of a hydroelectric dam that threatens the indigenous people that live there. 


I read this book as part of a course I took last year on Native American Literature. (See my post that will be up later today for more on Native American Literature.) Hogan's prose is intensely unique, psychological, meaningful and just so awesomely great. I wish more people would read this book, because it honestly changed the way I thought about literature and writing. 



3. Add your link to the Linky list below. 

Happy Hopping!